On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
...
>
> How about you introduce a reasonable max size for a transaction instead
> (256K?), and compare data_size with that? Might want to check with the EC
> folks
> what they expect larges transactions to be from
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
...
>
> How about you introduce a reasonable max size for a transaction instead
> (256K?), and compare data_size with that? Might want to check with the EC
> folks
> what they expect larges transactions to be from their side, and go
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:00:13AM -0800, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
> Add a check to prevent memory scribble when sending an ioctl with .insize
> set so large that memory allocation argument overflows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou
> ---
>
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:00:13AM -0800, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
> Add a check to prevent memory scribble when sending an ioctl with .insize
> set so large that memory allocation argument overflows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou
> ---
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_dev.c | 12
4 matches
Mail list logo