On 13.05.2015 10:38, Philipp Zabel wrote:
Hi Antoine, Sebastian,
Am Dienstag, den 12.05.2015, 16:43 +0200 schrieb Antoine Tenart:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:57:13AM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:16:26AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
Am Freitag, den 06.03.2015, 16:05 +
Hi Antoine, Sebastian,
Am Dienstag, den 12.05.2015, 16:43 +0200 schrieb Antoine Tenart:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:57:13AM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:16:26AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > >
> > > Am Freitag, den 06.03.2015, 16:05 +0100 schrieb Antoine Tenart:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:57:13AM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:16:26AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> >
> > Am Freitag, den 06.03.2015, 16:05 +0100 schrieb Antoine Tenart:
> > > The Berlin reset controller was introduced without being a platform
> > > driver because of
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Antoine Tenart
wrote:
> I think we better wait for the simple-mfd patch to make it to ARM SoC
> first.
I got impatient waiting for subsys ACKs and sent a pull request for
this today.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr
Hi Philipp,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:16:26AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, den 06.03.2015, 16:05 +0100 schrieb Antoine Tenart:
> > The Berlin reset controller was introduced without being a platform
> > driver because of a needed DT rework: the node describing the reset
> > contro
Hi Antoine,
Am Freitag, den 06.03.2015, 16:05 +0100 schrieb Antoine Tenart:
> The Berlin reset controller was introduced without being a platform
> driver because of a needed DT rework: the node describing the reset
> controller also describes the pinctrl and clk controllers...
>
> The DT issue b
6 matches
Mail list logo