Le 10/02/2018 à 15:43, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 13:54:25 +0100 (CET)
Christophe Leroy wrote:
bitmap_or() and bitmap_andnot() can work properly with dst identical
to src1 or src2. There is no need of an intermediate result bitmap
that is copied
Le 10/02/2018 à 15:43, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 13:54:25 +0100 (CET)
Christophe Leroy wrote:
bitmap_or() and bitmap_andnot() can work properly with dst identical
to src1 or src2. There is no need of an intermediate result bitmap
that is copied back to dst in a second
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 13:54:25 +0100 (CET)
Christophe Leroy wrote:
> bitmap_or() and bitmap_andnot() can work properly with dst identical
> to src1 or src2. There is no need of an intermediate result bitmap
> that is copied back to dst in a second step.
Everyone seems to
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 13:54:25 +0100 (CET)
Christophe Leroy wrote:
> bitmap_or() and bitmap_andnot() can work properly with dst identical
> to src1 or src2. There is no need of an intermediate result bitmap
> that is copied back to dst in a second step.
Everyone seems to be working on the slice
4 matches
Mail list logo