On 14/06/2013 06:12, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 04:57 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
Use sched_clock() instead of get_cycles().
We can use sched_clock() because we don't care much about accuracy.
Remove the dependency on X86_TSC
Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir
---
-static inline
On 14/06/2013 06:12, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 04:57 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
Use sched_clock() instead of get_cycles().
We can use sched_clock() because we don't care much about accuracy.
Remove the dependency on X86_TSC
Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 04:57 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> Use sched_clock() instead of get_cycles().
> We can use sched_clock() because we don't care much about accuracy.
> Remove the dependency on X86_TSC
>
> Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir
> ---
>
> -static inline bool can_poll_ll(cycles_t
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 04:57 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
Use sched_clock() instead of get_cycles().
We can use sched_clock() because we don't care much about accuracy.
Remove the dependency on X86_TSC
Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir eliezer.ta...@linux.intel.com
---
-static inline bool
4 matches
Mail list logo