Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 2/4] net: convert low latency sockets to sched_clock()

2013-06-14 Thread Eliezer Tamir
On 14/06/2013 06:12, Eric Dumazet wrote: On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 04:57 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote: Use sched_clock() instead of get_cycles(). We can use sched_clock() because we don't care much about accuracy. Remove the dependency on X86_TSC Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir --- -static inline

Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 2/4] net: convert low latency sockets to sched_clock()

2013-06-14 Thread Eliezer Tamir
On 14/06/2013 06:12, Eric Dumazet wrote: On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 04:57 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote: Use sched_clock() instead of get_cycles(). We can use sched_clock() because we don't care much about accuracy. Remove the dependency on X86_TSC Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir

Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 2/4] net: convert low latency sockets to sched_clock()

2013-06-13 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 04:57 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote: > Use sched_clock() instead of get_cycles(). > We can use sched_clock() because we don't care much about accuracy. > Remove the dependency on X86_TSC > > Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir > --- > > -static inline bool can_poll_ll(cycles_t

Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 2/4] net: convert low latency sockets to sched_clock()

2013-06-13 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 04:57 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote: Use sched_clock() instead of get_cycles(). We can use sched_clock() because we don't care much about accuracy. Remove the dependency on X86_TSC Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir eliezer.ta...@linux.intel.com --- -static inline bool