Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

Boris Brezillon writes: >> Hi Boris, >> >> So what's the status about the sync, should I pick the patches, and have the >> others make it to your for-next branch ? > > It's been merged in l2-mtd/master (our -next branch) which is > targeting 4.15.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

Boris Brezillon writes: >> Hi Boris, >> >> So what's the status about the sync, should I pick the patches, and have the >> others make it to your for-next branch ? > > It's been merged in l2-mtd/master (our -next branch) which is > targeting 4.15. Unfortunately we didn't create a topic branch,

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 11:53:11 +0200 Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > > Boris Brezillon writes: > > > >> Hi Robert, > >> Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 11:53:11 +0200 Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > > Boris Brezillon writes: > > > >> Hi Robert, > >> Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency on > >> patch 1 (it's not a build dependency, but NAND partitioning might be > >>

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 12:09:50 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 11:53:11 +0200 > Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > > > > Boris Brezillon

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 12:09:50 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 11:53:11 +0200 > Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > > > > Boris Brezillon writes: > > > > > >> Hi Robert, > > >> Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency on >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 11:53:11 +0200 Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > > Boris Brezillon writes: > > > >> Hi Robert, > >> Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 11:53:11 +0200 Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > > Boris Brezillon writes: > > > >> Hi Robert, > >> Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency on > >> patch 1 (it's not a build dependency, but NAND partitioning might be > >>

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

Robert Jarzmik writes: > Boris Brezillon writes: > >> Hi Robert, >> Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency on >> patch 1 (it's not a build dependency, but NAND partitioning might be >> wrong if you apply

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

Robert Jarzmik writes: > Boris Brezillon writes: > >> Hi Robert, >> Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency on >> patch 1 (it's not a build dependency, but NAND partitioning might be >> wrong if you apply them), so we need to sync. What release is >> pxa/for-next

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

Boris Brezillon writes: > Hi Robert, > Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency on > patch 1 (it's not a build dependency, but NAND partitioning might be > wrong if you apply them), so we need to sync. What release is > pxa/for-next

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

Boris Brezillon writes: > Hi Robert, > Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency on > patch 1 (it's not a build dependency, but NAND partitioning might be > wrong if you apply them), so we need to sync. What release is > pxa/for-next targeting? If it's 4.15 I can apply

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

Hi Robert, On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:33:02 +0200 Andrea Adami wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Robert Jarzmik > wrote: > > Boris Brezillon writes: > > > >> Le Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:48:31 +0200, > >>>

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

Hi Robert, On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:33:02 +0200 Andrea Adami wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Robert Jarzmik > wrote: > > Boris Brezillon writes: > > > >> Le Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:48:31 +0200, > >>> Andrea Adami (9): > >>> mtd: sharpslpart: Add sharpslpart partition parser > >>>

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Boris Brezillon writes: > >> Le Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:48:31 +0200, >>> Andrea Adami (9): >>> mtd: sharpslpart: Add sharpslpart partition parser >>> mtd: nand: sharpsl: Add

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Boris Brezillon writes: > >> Le Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:48:31 +0200, >>> Andrea Adami (9): >>> mtd: sharpslpart: Add sharpslpart partition parser >>> mtd: nand: sharpsl: Add partition parsers platform data >>> mfd: tmio: Add partition

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

Boris Brezillon writes: > Le Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:48:31 +0200, >> Andrea Adami (9): >> mtd: sharpslpart: Add sharpslpart partition parser >> mtd: nand: sharpsl: Add partition parsers platform data >> mfd: tmio: Add partition parsers platform data >>

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

Boris Brezillon writes: > Le Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:48:31 +0200, >> Andrea Adami (9): >> mtd: sharpslpart: Add sharpslpart partition parser >> mtd: nand: sharpsl: Add partition parsers platform data >> mfd: tmio: Add partition parsers platform data >> mtd: nand: sharpsl: Register partitions

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

Le Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:48:31 +0200, Andrea Adami a écrit : > This patchset introduces a simple partition parser for the Sharp SL > Series PXA handhelds. More details in the commit text. > > I have set in cc the ARM PXA maintainers because this is the MTD part of > a

Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser

Le Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:48:31 +0200, Andrea Adami a écrit : > This patchset introduces a simple partition parser for the Sharp SL > Series PXA handhelds. More details in the commit text. > > I have set in cc the ARM PXA maintainers because this is the MTD part of > a planned wider patchset