On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 04:05:45PM +1300, Kai Huang wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 17:38 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:21:41AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:00:03PM -0800, Sean Christopherson
> > > wrote:
> > > > What about
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 04:05:45PM +1300, Kai Huang wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 17:38 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:21:41AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:00:03PM -0800, Sean Christopherson
> > > wrote:
> > > > What about
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 17:38 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:21:41AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:00:03PM -0800, Sean Christopherson
> > wrote:
> > > What about SGX_LC_ENABLE? The title in the MSR section of the
> > > SDM is
> > > "SGX
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 17:38 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:21:41AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:00:03PM -0800, Sean Christopherson
> > wrote:
> > > What about SGX_LC_ENABLE? The title in the MSR section of the
> > > SDM is
> > > "SGX
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:21:41AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:00:03PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > What about SGX_LC_ENABLE? The title in the MSR section of the SDM is
> > "SGX Launch Control Enable", and it's more consistent with the other
> > bits
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:21:41AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:00:03PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > What about SGX_LC_ENABLE? The title in the MSR section of the SDM is
> > "SGX Launch Control Enable", and it's more consistent with the other
> > bits
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:00:03PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> What about SGX_LC_ENABLE? The title in the MSR section of the SDM is
> "SGX Launch Control Enable", and it's more consistent with the other
> bits defined in feature control. I'd also prefer that name for the
> actual #define
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:00:03PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> What about SGX_LC_ENABLE? The title in the MSR section of the SDM is
> "SGX Launch Control Enable", and it's more consistent with the other
> bits defined in feature control. I'd also prefer that name for the
> actual #define
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:03:23AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:44:50PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:40 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:24:07PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:03:23AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:44:50PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:40 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:24:07PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:55 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:33:14PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:24 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:55 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:33:14PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:24 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:44:50PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:40 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:24:07PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
>
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:44:50PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:40 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:24:07PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
>
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:33:14PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:24 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > So, maybe something like this?
> > > >
> > > > After SGX is
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:33:14PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:24 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > So, maybe something like this?
> > > >
> > > > After SGX is
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:40 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:24:07PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > So, maybe something like this?
> > > >
> > > > After SGX is
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:40 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:24:07PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > So, maybe something like this?
> > > >
> > > > After SGX is
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:24:07PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > So, maybe something like this?
> > >
> > > After SGX is activated[1] the IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASHn MSRs are writable
> > > if and only if SGX_LC is set in
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:24:07PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > So, maybe something like this?
> > >
> > > After SGX is activated[1] the IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASHn MSRs are writable
> > > if and only if SGX_LC is set in
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:24 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > So, maybe something like this?
> > >
> > > After SGX is activated[1] the IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASHn MSRs are writable
> > > if and only if SGX_LC is
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 23:24 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > So, maybe something like this?
> > >
> > > After SGX is activated[1] the IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASHn MSRs are writable
> > > if and only if SGX_LC is
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > So, maybe something like this?
> >
> > After SGX is activated[1] the IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASHn MSRs are writable
> > if and only if SGX_LC is set in the IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR and the
> > IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR is
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > So, maybe something like this?
> >
> > After SGX is activated[1] the IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASHn MSRs are writable
> > if and only if SGX_LC is set in the IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR and the
> > IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR is
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:28:03AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:16 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 21:29 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > When IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_LC identifies that the root key for
> > > enclave signatures
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:28:03AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:16 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 21:29 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > When IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_LC identifies that the root key for
> > > enclave signatures
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:16:11AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 21:29 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > When IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_LC identifies that the root key for
> > enclave signatures can be configured either by the OS or pre-boot
> > firmware.
> >
> > If
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:16:11AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 21:29 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > When IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_LC identifies that the root key for
> > enclave signatures can be configured either by the OS or pre-boot
> > firmware.
> >
> > If
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:16 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 21:29 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > When IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_LC identifies that the root key for
> > enclave signatures can be configured either by the OS or pre-boot
> > firmware.
> >
> > If this
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:16 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 21:29 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > When IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_LC identifies that the root key for
> > enclave signatures can be configured either by the OS or pre-boot
> > firmware.
> >
> > If this
On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 21:29 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> When IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_LC identifies that the root key for
> enclave signatures can be configured either by the OS or pre-boot
> firmware.
>
> If this the case, IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASHn MSRs (0 < n < 4) can be used
> to
> set the
On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 21:29 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> When IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_LC identifies that the root key for
> enclave signatures can be configured either by the OS or pre-boot
> firmware.
>
> If this the case, IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASHn MSRs (0 < n < 4) can be used
> to
> set the
32 matches
Mail list logo