On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:01:59PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> After following patch:
>> x86, 64bit: Set extra ident mapping for whole kernel range
>>
>> We have extra ident mapping for kernel that is loaded above 1G.
>
> What?
>
>
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:01:59PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
After following patch:
x86, 64bit: Set extra ident mapping for whole kernel range
We have extra ident mapping for kernel that is loaded above 1G.
What?
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:01:59PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> After following patch:
>> x86, 64bit: Set extra ident mapping for whole kernel range
>>
>> We have extra ident mapping for kernel that is loaded above 1G.
>
> What?
>
>
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:01:59PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> After following patch:
> x86, 64bit: Set extra ident mapping for whole kernel range
>
> We have extra ident mapping for kernel that is loaded above 1G.
What?
/me looks at next patch
Aaah, the *next* patch adds an extra ident
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:01:59PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
After following patch:
x86, 64bit: Set extra ident mapping for whole kernel range
We have extra ident mapping for kernel that is loaded above 1G.
What?
/me looks at next patch
Aaah, the *next* patch adds an extra ident
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:01:59PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
After following patch:
x86, 64bit: Set extra ident mapping for whole kernel range
We have extra ident mapping for kernel that is loaded above 1G.
What?
6 matches
Mail list logo