On 2015年01月28日 01:46, Timur Tabi wrote:
On 01/14/2015 09:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Tested-by: Timur Tabi
Thanks!
However, these 17 patches are insufficient to make ACPI work completely
on ARM64. I need to add two patches:
On 2015年01月28日 01:46, Timur Tabi wrote:
On 01/14/2015 09:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Tested-by: Timur Tabi ti...@codeaurora.org
Thanks!
However, these 17 patches are insufficient to make ACPI work completely
on ARM64. I need
On 01/14/2015 09:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Tested-by: Timur Tabi
However, these 17 patches are insufficient to make ACPI work completely
on ARM64. I need to add two patches:
acpi: add arm to the platforms that use ioremap
On 01/14/2015 09:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Tested-by: Timur Tabi ti...@codeaurora.org
However, these 17 patches are insufficient to make ACPI work completely
on ARM64. I need to add two patches:
acpi: add arm to the platforms
On 2015年01月16日 18:10, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:04:37PM +, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:29:44PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:23:47 +, Catalin Marinas
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > > > This is the v7 of ACPI core patches
On 2015年01月16日 18:10, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:04:37PM +, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:29:44PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:23:47 +, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
This
On 01/16/2015 09:49 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:40:28PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 15:33:20 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:29:22PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:05:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Actually, another thing that might help would be if you and/or Will were
> > to prod the relevant people for review, letting them know that the
> > controversy isn't
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:23:47 +
, Catalin Marinas
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > > This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
> >
> > I'll get right to the
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:40:28PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2015 15:33:20 Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +,
On Friday 16 January 2015 15:33:20 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > > > I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > > I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
> > > drivers that I'm about to submit
Hi Will,
On 01/16/2015 08:55 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
drivers that I'm about to submit upstream with the V7 patch series
on the AMD Seattle server platform.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > > I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
> > > drivers that I'm about to submit
On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
> > drivers that I'm about to submit upstream with the V7 patch series
> > on the AMD Seattle
Hi Tom,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
> drivers that I'm about to submit upstream with the V7 patch series
> on the AMD Seattle server platform. There does not appear to be support
> for the _CCA
On 01/16/2015 01:17 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年01月16日 02:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo
wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
I'll get right
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:05:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:10:34AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > Indeed, keeping the series as one thread is better. Apart from a
> > slightly less misleading subject, I suggest Hanjun that he passes each
> > patch via
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:10:34AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Indeed, keeping the series as one thread is better. Apart from a
> slightly less misleading subject, I suggest Hanjun that he passes each
> patch via get_maintainer.pl and adds the corresponding Cc: lines to the
> commit log. I
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:51:39PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:31:59PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Just changing the subject lines to be more suitable would help, but
> > given the painful thread it's probably worth going the extra step if
> > the lack of these
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +, Al Stone wrote:
> On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>> This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:04:37PM +, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> > > > I'll get right to the
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:17:56AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年01月16日 02:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>> This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:29:22PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:05:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
Actually, another thing that might help would be if you and/or Will were
to prod the relevant people for review, letting them know that the
controversy isn't likely to
On 01/16/2015 09:49 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:40:28PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 15:33:20 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:17:56AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年01月16日 02:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:04:37PM +, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
I'll get right to the point: Can we
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:31:53PM +, Al Stone wrote:
On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:51:39PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:31:59PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
Just changing the subject lines to be more suitable would help, but
given the painful thread it's probably worth going the extra step if
the lack of these reviews is a
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:10:34AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Indeed, keeping the series as one thread is better. Apart from a
slightly less misleading subject, I suggest Hanjun that he passes each
patch via get_maintainer.pl and adds the corresponding Cc: lines to the
commit log. I think
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:05:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:10:34AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Indeed, keeping the series as one thread is better. Apart from a
slightly less misleading subject, I suggest Hanjun that he passes each
patch via get_maintainer.pl
On 01/16/2015 01:17 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年01月16日 02:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org
wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI
Hi Tom,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
drivers that I'm about to submit upstream with the V7 patch series
on the AMD Seattle server platform. There does not appear to be support
for the _CCA
On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
drivers that I'm about to submit upstream with the V7 patch series
on the AMD Seattle server
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
drivers that I'm about to submit upstream
Hi Will,
On 01/16/2015 08:55 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
drivers that I'm about to submit upstream with the V7 patch series
on the AMD Seattle server platform.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the amd-xgbe/amd-xgbe-phy
drivers that I'm about to submit upstream
On Friday 16 January 2015 15:33:20 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky wrote:
I have tested ACPI-enablement patches for the
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:40:28PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 15:33:20 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:14:13PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2015 14:55:45 Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:30PM +, Tom Lendacky
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:23:47 +
, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com
wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI
On 2015年01月16日 04:31, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:04:37PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all
being posted as part of big and apparently controversial
On 2015年01月16日 02:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this
On 01/15/2015 04:31 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
>>>
>>> I'll get
On 1/14/2015 9:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
Hi,
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
updates from v6:
- Rebased on top of 3.19-rc4, add Mack Salter's patch to use
the early_ioremap after paging_init() for ACPI table mappings;
- Two patches about converting
On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
>>
>> I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:31:59PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:04:37PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all
> > > being posted as part
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:04:37PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all
> > being posted as part of big and apparently controversial threads with
> > subject lines in
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> > > I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
> > > for v3.20?
>
> >
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
> > for v3.20?
> Before you even ask for this, please look at the patches and realise
> that
On 01/14/2015 10:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
>
> updates from v6:
> - Rebased on top of 3.19-rc4, add Mack Salter's patch to use
> the early_ioremap after paging_init() for ACPI table mappings;
>
> - Two patches
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
>
> I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
> for v3.20?
Before you
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Hi Catalin and Will,
I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
for v3.20? I really think we've hit the point where it is more
valuable to
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
for v3.20?
Before you even ask for this, please look at the patches and realise
that there
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
for v3.20?
On 01/14/2015 10:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
Hi,
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
updates from v6:
- Rebased on top of 3.19-rc4, add Mack Salter's patch to use
the early_ioremap after paging_init() for ACPI table mappings;
- Two patches about
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Hi Catalin and Will,
I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
for v3.20? I really think we've hit the point where it is
On 1/14/2015 9:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
Hi,
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
updates from v6:
- Rebased on top of 3.19-rc4, add Mack Salter's patch to use
the early_ioremap after paging_init() for ACPI table mappings;
- Two patches about converting
On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
I'll get right to the point: Can we please have
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:31:59PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:04:37PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all
being posted as part of big and
On 01/15/2015 04:31 PM, Al Stone wrote:
On 01/15/2015 11:23 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
I'll
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:04:37PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all
being posted as part of big and apparently controversial threads with
subject lines in the form
On 2015年01月16日 02:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
I'll get right to the point: Can we
On 2015年01月16日 04:31, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:04:37PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
There's probably a bit of a process problem here - these patches are all
being posted as part of big and apparently controversial
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:02:20PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:23:47PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
for v3.20?
Before you even
66 matches
Mail list logo
