Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:42:24PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 04/11/2017 08:36 PM, Yury Norov wrote: > >>Also, the latest benchmarks I've seen were mostly for user space > >>while I'm more concerned with the user-kernel interface >

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:42:24PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 04/11/2017 08:36 PM, Yury Norov wrote: > >>Also, the latest benchmarks I've seen were mostly for user space > >>while I'm more concerned with the user-kernel interface >

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

On 04/11/2017 08:36 PM, Yury Norov wrote: Also, the latest benchmarks I've seen were mostly for user space while I'm more concerned with the user-kernel interface (https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel=148690490713310=2). On the glibc testing side, have the regressions been identified/fixed?

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

On 04/11/2017 08:36 PM, Yury Norov wrote: Also, the latest benchmarks I've seen were mostly for user space while I'm more concerned with the user-kernel interface (https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel=148690490713310=2). On the glibc testing side, have the regressions been identified/fixed?

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

> Also, the latest benchmarks I've seen were mostly for user space > while I'm more concerned with the user-kernel interface > (https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel=148690490713310=2). > On the glibc testing side, have the regressions been identified/fixed? I run LTP for testing the ABI and

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

> Also, the latest benchmarks I've seen were mostly for user space > while I'm more concerned with the user-kernel interface > (https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel=148690490713310=2). > On the glibc testing side, have the regressions been identified/fixed? I run LTP for testing the ABI and

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:33:35PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:47:40PM +0400, Yury Norov wrote: > > According to latest plans figured out on Linaro Connect, ILP32 should > > be taken in 4.12 merge window. > > Sorry, I wasn't present at Linaro Connect, so definitely

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:33:35PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:47:40PM +0400, Yury Norov wrote: > > According to latest plans figured out on Linaro Connect, ILP32 should > > be taken in 4.12 merge window. > > Sorry, I wasn't present at Linaro Connect, so definitely

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

On Apr 11 2017, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Is there an up to date pre-built toolchain and a filesystem for ILP32? https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:ILP32 should have everything you need. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs,

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

On Apr 11 2017, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Is there an up to date pre-built toolchain and a filesystem for ILP32? https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:ILP32 should have everything you need. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint =

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:47:40PM +0400, Yury Norov wrote: > According to latest plans figured out on Linaro Connect, ILP32 should > be taken in 4.12 merge window. Sorry, I wasn't present at Linaro Connect, so definitely not involved in such decision. BTW, it would be nice to have Arnd's ack on

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:47:40PM +0400, Yury Norov wrote: > According to latest plans figured out on Linaro Connect, ILP32 should > be taken in 4.12 merge window. Sorry, I wasn't present at Linaro Connect, so definitely not involved in such decision. BTW, it would be nice to have Arnd's ack on

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

Hi Catalin, According to latest plans figured out on Linaro Connect, ILP32 should be taken in 4.12 merge window. The window will be opened in less than a month, so I'd like to remind it to you, and ask if you have any questions/requests related to ILP32. Is it still realistic idea to take patches

Re: [PATCH v7 resend 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64

Hi Catalin, According to latest plans figured out on Linaro Connect, ILP32 should be taken in 4.12 merge window. The window will be opened in less than a month, so I'd like to remind it to you, and ask if you have any questions/requests related to ILP32. Is it still realistic idea to take patches