Re: [PATCH v9 2/9] x509: Detect sm2 keys by their parameters OID

2021-03-07 Thread Tianjia Zhang
Hi, On 3/5/21 11:04 PM, Stefan Berger wrote: On 3/5/21 2:37 AM, Tianjia Zhang wrote: Hi, On 3/4/21 7:46 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: Tianjia,     can you say whether SM2 support works for you before and after applying this patch? I cannot verify it with an sm2 key I have created using a

Re: [PATCH v9 2/9] x509: Detect sm2 keys by their parameters OID

2021-03-05 Thread Stefan Berger
On 3/5/21 2:37 AM, Tianjia Zhang wrote: Hi, On 3/4/21 7:46 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: Tianjia,     can you say whether SM2 support works for you before and after applying this patch? I cannot verify it with an sm2 key I have created using a sequence of commands like this:  > modprobe

Re: [PATCH v9 2/9] x509: Detect sm2 keys by their parameters OID

2021-03-04 Thread Tianjia Zhang
Hi, On 3/4/21 7:46 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: Tianjia,    can you say whether SM2 support works for you before and after applying this patch? I cannot verify it with an sm2 key I have created using a sequence of commands like this: > modprobe sm2_generic > id=$(keyctl newring test @u) >

Re: [PATCH v9 2/9] x509: Detect sm2 keys by their parameters OID

2021-03-03 Thread Stefan Berger
Tianjia,    can you say whether SM2 support works for you before and after applying this patch? I cannot verify it with an sm2 key I have created using a sequence of commands like this: > modprobe sm2_generic > id=$(keyctl newring test @u) > keyctl padd asymmetric "" $id < sm2.der add_key: