On Mon, 04 Dec 2000 07:29:10 +1100,
Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 3 Dec 2000 07:43:01 -0600 (CST),
>Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Keith Owens wrote:
>>> If you go down this path, please add a standard performance monitoring
>>> method to query
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000 07:43:01 -0600 (CST),
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Keith Owens wrote:
>> If you go down this path, please add a standard performance monitoring
>> method to query the current capacity of an interface.
>Well, ethtool interface supports reporting
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Keith Owens wrote:
> If you go down this path, please add a standard performance monitoring
> method to query the current capacity of an interface.
> to report "eth0 is handling 1 Megabyte/second, but we cannot tell if
> that is 90% (10BaseT) or 9% (100BaseT) utilization". We
(CC list trimmed)
Philip Blundell writes:
> >Does it? At which point? To me it looks like it calls dev->do_ioctl
> >or am I missing something?
>
> It uses SIOCSIFMAP, which (I think) winds up in dev.c here:
>
> case SIOCSIFMAP:
> if (dev->set_config) {
>
>Does it? At which point? To me it looks like it calls dev->do_ioctl
>or am I missing something?
It uses SIOCSIFMAP, which (I think) winds up in dev.c here:
case SIOCSIFMAP:
if (dev->set_config) {
if (!netif_device_present(dev))
Does it? At which point? To me it looks like it calls dev-do_ioctl
or am I missing something?
It uses SIOCSIFMAP, which (I think) winds up in dev.c here:
case SIOCSIFMAP:
if (dev-set_config) {
if (!netif_device_present(dev))
(CC list trimmed)
Philip Blundell writes:
Does it? At which point? To me it looks like it calls dev-do_ioctl
or am I missing something?
It uses SIOCSIFMAP, which (I think) winds up in dev.c here:
case SIOCSIFMAP:
if (dev-set_config) {
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Keith Owens wrote:
If you go down this path, please add a standard performance monitoring
method to query the current capacity of an interface.
to report "eth0 is handling 1 Megabyte/second, but we cannot tell if
that is 90% (10BaseT) or 9% (100BaseT) utilization". We
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000 07:43:01 -0600 (CST),
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Keith Owens wrote:
If you go down this path, please add a standard performance monitoring
method to query the current capacity of an interface.
Well, ethtool interface supports reporting media
On Mon, 04 Dec 2000 07:29:10 +1100,
Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000 07:43:01 -0600 (CST),
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Keith Owens wrote:
If you go down this path, please add a standard performance monitoring
method to query the current
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:07:29 -0600 (CST),
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If yes, my guess is correct, I think the proper solution is to:
>* create a generic set_config, which does nothing but convert the calls'
>semantics into ethtool semantics, and
>* add ethtool support to the specific
>Does 'ifconfig eth0 media xxx' wind up calling dev->set_config?
Yes.
p.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 11:09:35AM -0500, Donald Becker wrote:
>
> Hey, I'll make it easy. Find an approach that fully handles only the Tulip
> and 3c59x drivers, and that is consistent.
>
> Actually, I starteed work on adding this to the
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> > Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit :
> > [...]
> > > We already have a standard interface for this, but many drivers do not
> > > support it. Its called "ifconfig eth0 media xxx":
> Actually, I starteed work on adding this to the
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit :
> [...]
> > We already have a standard interface for this, but many drivers do not
> > support it. Its called "ifconfig eth0 media xxx":
Uhmmm, it's not a standard if "many drivers do not support it".
It is
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Francois Romieu wrote:
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit :
[...]
We already have a standard interface for this, but many drivers do not
support it. Its called "ifconfig eth0 media xxx":
Uhmmm, it's not a standard if "many drivers do not support it".
It is very
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit :
[...]
We already have a standard interface for this, but many drivers do not
support it. Its called "ifconfig eth0 media xxx":
Actually, I starteed work on adding this to the 3c59x code
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 11:09:35AM -0500, Donald Becker wrote:
Hey, I'll make it easy. Find an approach that fully handles only the Tulip
and 3c59x drivers, and that is consistent.
Actually, I starteed work on adding this to the 3c59x
Does 'ifconfig eth0 media xxx' wind up calling dev-set_config?
Yes.
p.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:07:29 -0600 (CST),
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If yes, my guess is correct, I think the proper solution is to:
* create a generic set_config, which does nothing but convert the calls'
semantics into ethtool semantics, and
* add ethtool support to the specific
On Fri, 01 Dec 2000, Francois romieu wrote:
> [netdev Cced]
>
> The Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:16:52AM -0800, Ivan Passos wrote :
> [...]
> > For synchronous network interfaces, besides configuring network parameters
> > such as IP address, netmask, MTU, etc., the system should also configure
> >
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Russell King wri
tes:
>We already have a standard interface for this, but many drivers do not
>support it. Its called "ifconfig eth0 media xxx":
The Ethtool interface is rather better.
p.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> Actually; Ethernet badly needs something like this too. I would kill
> to be able to do something like:
>
> ifconfig eth0 speed 100 duplex full
Even if you are thinking about Ethernet only, it's not easy to do it. Most
modern NICs have MII
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit :
[...]
> We already have a standard interface for this, but many drivers do not
> support it. Its called "ifconfig eth0 media xxx":
>
> bash-2.04# ifconfig --help
> Usage:
> ifconfig [-a] [-i] [-v] [-s] [[] ]
> ...
> [mem_start ] [io_addr ] [irq ]
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Actually; Ethernet badly needs something like this too. I would kill
> > to be able to do something like:
>
> > ifconfig eth0 speed 100 duplex full
>
> > o across different networks cards -- I've been thinking about it of
> > late as I had to
Chris Wedgwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit :
[...]
> o across different networks cards -- I've been thinking about it of
> late as I had to battle with this earlier this week; depending on
> what network card you use, you need different magic incarnations to
> do the above.
>
> A standard
Chris Wedgwood writes:
> Actually; Ethernet badly needs something like this too. I would kill
> to be able to do something like:
>
> ifconfig eth0 speed 100 duplex full
>
> o across different networks cards -- I've been thinking about it of
> late as I had to battle with this earlier this
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Actually; Ethernet badly needs something like this too. I would kill
> to be able to do something like:
> ifconfig eth0 speed 100 duplex full
> o across different networks cards -- I've been thinking about it of
> late as I had to battle with
[netdev Cced]
The Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:16:52AM -0800, Ivan Passos wrote :
[...]
> For synchronous network interfaces, besides configuring network parameters
> such as IP address, netmask, MTU, etc., the system should also configure
> parameters specific to these sync i/f's, such as media (e.g
[netdev Cced]
The Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:16:52AM -0800, Ivan Passos wrote :
[...]
For synchronous network interfaces, besides configuring network parameters
such as IP address, netmask, MTU, etc., the system should also configure
parameters specific to these sync i/f's, such as media (e.g
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Actually; Ethernet badly needs something like this too. I would kill
to be able to do something like:
ifconfig eth0 speed 100 duplex full
o across different networks cards -- I've been thinking about it of
late as I had to battle with this
Chris Wedgwood writes:
Actually; Ethernet badly needs something like this too. I would kill
to be able to do something like:
ifconfig eth0 speed 100 duplex full
o across different networks cards -- I've been thinking about it of
late as I had to battle with this earlier this week;
Chris Wedgwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit :
[...]
o across different networks cards -- I've been thinking about it of
late as I had to battle with this earlier this week; depending on
what network card you use, you need different magic incarnations to
do the above.
A standard interface is
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Actually; Ethernet badly needs something like this too. I would kill
to be able to do something like:
ifconfig eth0 speed 100 duplex full
o across different networks cards -- I've been thinking about it of
late as I had to battle with
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit :
[...]
We already have a standard interface for this, but many drivers do not
support it. Its called "ifconfig eth0 media xxx":
bash-2.04# ifconfig --help
Usage:
ifconfig [-a] [-i] [-v] [-s] interface [[AF] address]
...
[mem_start NN] [io_addr
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
Actually; Ethernet badly needs something like this too. I would kill
to be able to do something like:
ifconfig eth0 speed 100 duplex full
Even if you are thinking about Ethernet only, it's not easy to do it. Most
modern NICs have MII
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Russell King wri
tes:
We already have a standard interface for this, but many drivers do not
support it. Its called "ifconfig eth0 media xxx":
The Ethtool interface is rather better.
p.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
On Fri, 01 Dec 2000, Francois romieu wrote:
[netdev Cced]
The Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:16:52AM -0800, Ivan Passos wrote :
[...]
For synchronous network interfaces, besides configuring network parameters
such as IP address, netmask, MTU, etc., the system should also configure
parameters
38 matches
Mail list logo
