Paul Menage wrote:
> On 6/25/07, Paul Menage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 6/22/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
>>> individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
>>> use
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:05 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
>
>> Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
>> individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
>> use cases for pagecache_limit alone without RSS_limit
On 6/22/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
use cases for pagecache_limit alone without RSS_limit like the case of
database application
On 6/25/07, Paul Menage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/22/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
> individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
> use cases for pagecache_limit alone
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:05 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
>
>> Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
>> individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
>> use cases for pagecache_limit alone without RSS_limit
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:05 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
> individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
> use cases for pagecache_limit alone without RSS_limit like the case of
> database
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:05 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
use cases for pagecache_limit alone without RSS_limit like the case of
database
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:05 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
use cases for pagecache_limit alone without RSS_limit like the
On 6/22/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
use cases for pagecache_limit alone without RSS_limit like the case of
database application
On 6/25/07, Paul Menage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/22/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
use cases for pagecache_limit alone without
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:05 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
use cases for pagecache_limit alone without RSS_limit like the
Paul Menage wrote:
On 6/25/07, Paul Menage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/22/07, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Merging both limits will eliminate the issue, however we would need
individual limits for pagecache and RSS for better control. There are
use cases for
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 16:33 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[snip]
> Not quite sure on 2, from reading the pagecache controller, I got the
> impression that enforcing both limits got you into trouble. Merging the
> limits would rid us of that issue,
Balbir Singh wrote:
[snip]
>> With the current dual list approach, something like that could be done
>> by treating the container lists as pure FIFO (and ignore the reference
>> bit and all that) and make container reclaim only unmap, not write out
>> pages.
>>
>> Then global reclaim will do the
Balbir Singh wrote:
[snip]
With the current dual list approach, something like that could be done
by treating the container lists as pure FIFO (and ignore the reference
bit and all that) and make container reclaim only unmap, not write out
pages.
Then global reclaim will do the work (if
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 16:33 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[snip]
Not quite sure on 2, from reading the pagecache controller, I got the
impression that enforcing both limits got you into trouble. Merging the
limits would rid us of that issue, no?
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 16:33 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> Having read the RSS and Pagecache controllers some things bothered me.
>>>
>>> - the duplication of much of the reclaim data (not code)
>>>and the size increase as a result thereof.
>>>
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 16:33 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Having read the RSS and Pagecache controllers some things bothered me.
> >
> > - the duplication of much of the reclaim data (not code)
> >and the size increase as a result thereof.
> >
>
> Are you referring
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Having read the RSS and Pagecache controllers some things bothered me.
>
> - the duplication of much of the reclaim data (not code)
>and the size increase as a result thereof.
>
Are you referring to the duplication due to the per container LRU list?
> - the clear
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Having read the RSS and Pagecache controllers some things bothered me.
- the duplication of much of the reclaim data (not code)
and the size increase as a result thereof.
Are you referring to the duplication due to the per container LRU list?
- the clear
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 16:33 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Having read the RSS and Pagecache controllers some things bothered me.
- the duplication of much of the reclaim data (not code)
and the size increase as a result thereof.
Are you referring to the
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 16:33 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Having read the RSS and Pagecache controllers some things bothered me.
- the duplication of much of the reclaim data (not code)
and the size increase as a result thereof.
Are you
22 matches
Mail list logo
