Re: [RFC 04/15] regulator: add restrack support

2014-12-12 Thread Andrzej Hajda
On 12/11/2014 02:43 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:58:37PM +, Mark Brown wrote: >> I'd expect someone reading the change in the regulator API to have at >> least some idea how this fits in with the rest of the API and how to use >> it, and probably more importa

Re: [RFC 04/15] regulator: add restrack support

2014-12-11 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:58:37PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > I'd expect someone reading the change in the regulator API to have at > least some idea how this fits in with the rest of the API and how to use > it, and probably more importantly I'd expect to be able to understand > why this is DT onl

Re: [RFC 04/15] regulator: add restrack support

2014-12-11 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:49:54AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 12/10/2014 05:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> Regulators supports various methods of lookup. > >> The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators. > > W

Re: [RFC 04/15] regulator: add restrack support

2014-12-11 Thread Andrzej Hajda
Hi Mark, On 12/10/2014 05:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> Regulators supports various methods of lookup. >> The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators. > Why, what does this mean and how might one use it? I've not looke

Re: [RFC 04/15] regulator: add restrack support

2014-12-10 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > Regulators supports various methods of lookup. > The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators. Why, what does this mean and how might one use it? I've not looked at the code since I don't know what it's supposed to ac