On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:15 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:57:13PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > lockdep support for seqlock was discussed at:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=137875860600648=2
> >
> > This is very draft patch to add lockdep support for
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:57:13PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> Hi,
>
> lockdep support for seqlock was discussed at:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=137875860600648=2
>
> This is very draft patch to add lockdep support for seqlock.
> Actually, it doesn't work yet. I throw it out to get comments
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:57:13PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
Hi,
lockdep support for seqlock was discussed at:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=137875860600648w=2
This is very draft patch to add lockdep support for seqlock.
Actually, it doesn't work yet. I throw it out to get comments and
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:15 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:57:13PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
Hi,
lockdep support for seqlock was discussed at:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=137875860600648w=2
This is very draft patch to add lockdep support for seqlock.
4 matches
Mail list logo