>
> Hi Bart,
>
> On Sat, 2020-07-11 at 20:21 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 2020-07-06 06:22, Stanley Chu wrote:
> > > +static void ufshcd_cleanup_queue(struct scsi_device *sdev, void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + if (sdev->request_queue)
> > > +
Hi Bart,
On Sat, 2020-07-11 at 20:21 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2020-07-06 06:22, Stanley Chu wrote:
> > +static void ufshcd_cleanup_queue(struct scsi_device *sdev, void *data)
> > +{
> > + if (sdev->request_queue)
> > + blk_cleanup_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> > +}
>
> No
On 2020-07-06 06:22, Stanley Chu wrote:
> +static void ufshcd_cleanup_queue(struct scsi_device *sdev, void *data)
> +{
> + if (sdev->request_queue)
> + blk_cleanup_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> +}
No SCSI LLD should ever call blk_cleanup_queue() directly for
sdev->request_queue.
Hi Bart, Avri,
May I know if you have any suggestion for this RFC fix?
Very appreciated : )
On Mon, 2020-07-06 at 21:22 +0800, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Currently I/O request could be still submitted to UFS device while
> UFS is working on shutdown flow. This may lead to racing as below
> scenarios
4 matches
Mail list logo
