Re: [RFC v0 2/9] suspend: Add getter function to report if freezing is active

2015-09-08 Thread Daniel Wagner
On 09/07/2015 11:44 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, September 07, 2015 10:55:43 AM Daniel Wagner wrote: >> On 09/05/2015 04:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Friday, September 04, 2015 03:34:55 PM Daniel Wagner wrote: Instead encode the FREEZE state via the CPU state we allow

Re: [RFC v0 2/9] suspend: Add getter function to report if freezing is active

2015-09-08 Thread Daniel Wagner
On 09/07/2015 11:44 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, September 07, 2015 10:55:43 AM Daniel Wagner wrote: >> On 09/05/2015 04:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Friday, September 04, 2015 03:34:55 PM Daniel Wagner wrote: Instead encode the FREEZE state via the CPU state we allow

Re: [RFC v0 2/9] suspend: Add getter function to report if freezing is active

2015-09-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, September 07, 2015 10:55:43 AM Daniel Wagner wrote: > On 09/05/2015 04:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, September 04, 2015 03:34:55 PM Daniel Wagner wrote: > >> Instead encode the FREEZE state via the CPU state we allow the > >> interesting subsystems (MCE, microcode) to

Re: [RFC v0 2/9] suspend: Add getter function to report if freezing is active

2015-09-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, September 07, 2015 10:55:43 AM Daniel Wagner wrote: > On 09/05/2015 04:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, September 04, 2015 03:34:55 PM Daniel Wagner wrote: > >> Instead encode the FREEZE state via the CPU state we allow the > >> interesting subsystems (MCE, microcode) to

Re: [RFC v0 2/9] suspend: Add getter function to report if freezing is active

2015-09-07 Thread Daniel Wagner
On 09/05/2015 04:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, September 04, 2015 03:34:55 PM Daniel Wagner wrote: >> Instead encode the FREEZE state via the CPU state we allow the >> interesting subsystems (MCE, microcode) to query the power >> subsystem directly. > > A use case, please. The

Re: [RFC v0 2/9] suspend: Add getter function to report if freezing is active

2015-09-07 Thread Daniel Wagner
On 09/05/2015 04:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, September 04, 2015 03:34:55 PM Daniel Wagner wrote: >> Instead encode the FREEZE state via the CPU state we allow the >> interesting subsystems (MCE, microcode) to query the power >> subsystem directly. > > A use case, please. The

Re: [RFC v0 2/9] suspend: Add getter function to report if freezing is active

2015-09-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, September 07, 2015 10:55:43 AM Daniel Wagner wrote: > On 09/05/2015 04:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, September 04, 2015 03:34:55 PM Daniel Wagner wrote: > >> Instead encode the FREEZE state via the CPU state we allow the > >> interesting subsystems (MCE, microcode) to

Re: [RFC v0 2/9] suspend: Add getter function to report if freezing is active

2015-09-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, September 07, 2015 10:55:43 AM Daniel Wagner wrote: > On 09/05/2015 04:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, September 04, 2015 03:34:55 PM Daniel Wagner wrote: > >> Instead encode the FREEZE state via the CPU state we allow the > >> interesting subsystems (MCE, microcode) to

Re: [RFC v0 2/9] suspend: Add getter function to report if freezing is active

2015-09-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, September 04, 2015 03:34:55 PM Daniel Wagner wrote: > Instead encode the FREEZE state via the CPU state we allow the > interesting subsystems (MCE, microcode) to query the power > subsystem directly. A use case, please. > Most notifiers are not interested at all > in this information

Re: [RFC v0 2/9] suspend: Add getter function to report if freezing is active

2015-09-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, September 04, 2015 03:34:55 PM Daniel Wagner wrote: > Instead encode the FREEZE state via the CPU state we allow the > interesting subsystems (MCE, microcode) to query the power > subsystem directly. A use case, please. > Most notifiers are not interested at all > in this information