On 2018/7/17 21:07, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> jiangyiwen wrote on Tue, Jul 17, 2018:
>> On 2018/7/17 19:42, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>>>
Subject: net/9p: Fix a deadlock case in the virtio transport
>>>
>>> I hadn't noticed in the v1, but how is that a deadlock fix?
>>> The previous code
On 2018/7/17 21:07, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> jiangyiwen wrote on Tue, Jul 17, 2018:
>> On 2018/7/17 19:42, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>>>
Subject: net/9p: Fix a deadlock case in the virtio transport
>>>
>>> I hadn't noticed in the v1, but how is that a deadlock fix?
>>> The previous code
jiangyiwen wrote on Tue, Jul 17, 2018:
> On 2018/7/17 19:42, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> >
> >> Subject: net/9p: Fix a deadlock case in the virtio transport
> >
> > I hadn't noticed in the v1, but how is that a deadlock fix?
> > The previous code doesn't look like it deadlocks to me, the commit
jiangyiwen wrote on Tue, Jul 17, 2018:
> On 2018/7/17 19:42, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> >
> >> Subject: net/9p: Fix a deadlock case in the virtio transport
> >
> > I hadn't noticed in the v1, but how is that a deadlock fix?
> > The previous code doesn't look like it deadlocks to me, the commit
On 2018/7/17 19:42, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>
>> Subject: net/9p: Fix a deadlock case in the virtio transport
>
> I hadn't noticed in the v1, but how is that a deadlock fix?
> The previous code doesn't look like it deadlocks to me, the commit
> message is more correct.
>
Hi Dominique,
If
On 2018/7/17 19:42, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>
>> Subject: net/9p: Fix a deadlock case in the virtio transport
>
> I hadn't noticed in the v1, but how is that a deadlock fix?
> The previous code doesn't look like it deadlocks to me, the commit
> message is more correct.
>
Hi Dominique,
If
> Subject: net/9p: Fix a deadlock case in the virtio transport
I hadn't noticed in the v1, but how is that a deadlock fix?
The previous code doesn't look like it deadlocks to me, the commit
message is more correct.
jiangyiwen wrote on Tue, Jul 17, 2018:
> When client has multiple threads that
> Subject: net/9p: Fix a deadlock case in the virtio transport
I hadn't noticed in the v1, but how is that a deadlock fix?
The previous code doesn't look like it deadlocks to me, the commit
message is more correct.
jiangyiwen wrote on Tue, Jul 17, 2018:
> When client has multiple threads that
LGTM
On 2018/7/17 19:03, jiangyiwen wrote:
> When client has multiple threads that issue io requests
> all the time, and the server has a very good performance,
> it may cause cpu is running in the irq context for a long
> time because it can check virtqueue has buf in the *while*
> loop.
>
> So
LGTM
On 2018/7/17 19:03, jiangyiwen wrote:
> When client has multiple threads that issue io requests
> all the time, and the server has a very good performance,
> it may cause cpu is running in the irq context for a long
> time because it can check virtqueue has buf in the *while*
> loop.
>
> So
10 matches
Mail list logo
