Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.24

2005-07-29 Thread Con Kolivas
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:47, Gabriel Devenyi wrote: > Thats correct, does it need it? For the memload, yes it does. I guess for the next version I can drop memload if it can't read the swap information rather than not running at all. Cheers, Con > Con Kolivas wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2005

Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.24

2005-07-29 Thread Gabriel Devenyi
Thats correct, does it need it? -- Gabriel Devenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Con Kolivas wrote: On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:11, Gabriel Devenyi wrote: Hello Con, Attempting to run this on my 2.6.12-ck3s system results in the following error: sawtooth interbench-0.24 # ./interbench loops_per_ms unknown;

Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.24

2005-07-29 Thread Con Kolivas
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:11, Gabriel Devenyi wrote: > Hello Con, > > Attempting to run this on my 2.6.12-ck3s system results in the following > error: > > sawtooth interbench-0.24 # ./interbench > loops_per_ms unknown; benchmarking... > 690936 loops_per_ms saved to file interbench.loops_per_ms > >

Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.24

2005-07-29 Thread Con Kolivas
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:11, Gabriel Devenyi wrote: Hello Con, Attempting to run this on my 2.6.12-ck3s system results in the following error: sawtooth interbench-0.24 # ./interbench loops_per_ms unknown; benchmarking... 690936 loops_per_ms saved to file interbench.loops_per_ms Could not

Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.24

2005-07-29 Thread Gabriel Devenyi
Thats correct, does it need it? -- Gabriel Devenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Con Kolivas wrote: On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:11, Gabriel Devenyi wrote: Hello Con, Attempting to run this on my 2.6.12-ck3s system results in the following error: sawtooth interbench-0.24 # ./interbench loops_per_ms unknown;

Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.24

2005-07-29 Thread Con Kolivas
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:47, Gabriel Devenyi wrote: Thats correct, does it need it? For the memload, yes it does. I guess for the next version I can drop memload if it can't read the swap information rather than not running at all. Cheers, Con Con Kolivas wrote: On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:11,