Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> Time to revisit this decision >> >> >> >> So, based on the fact that children device names usually contain >> >> dashes, I do not understand why hwmon would be any special in this >> >> regard. It is possible that the hwmon developers

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: >>> >> > Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon >>> >> > device names. >>> >> >>> >> Also, where is that

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> >> > Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon >> >> > device names. >> >> >> >> Also, where is that documented? >> > >> > In Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface: >> > >>

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Lee Jones
> >> Time to revisit this decision > >> > >> So, based on the fact that children device names usually contain > >> dashes, I do not understand why hwmon would be any special in this > >> regard. It is possible that the hwmon developers have not faced much > >> MFD situation before, and so,

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> >> >> > Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon >> >> >> > device names. >> >> >> >> >> >> Also, where is that documented? >> >> > >> >> > In

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Lee Jones
> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > >> >> > Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon > >> >> > device names. > >> >> > >> >> Also, where is that documented? > >> > > >> > In Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface: > >> > > >> > * > >> > *

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: >>> >> > Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon >>> >> > device names. >>> >> >>> >> Also, where is that

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Le Tuesday 11 February 2014 à 08:28 +, Laszlo Papp a écrit : >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> > Hi Laszlo, >> > >> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:13:37 +, Laszlo Papp wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM,

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> >> > Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon >> >> > device names. >> >> >> >> Also, where is that documented? >> > >> > In Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface: >> > >>

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Lee Jones
> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > >> > Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon > >> > device names. > >> > >> Also, where is that documented? > > > > In Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface: > > > > * > > * Global attributes * > >

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Jean Delvare
Le Tuesday 11 February 2014 à 08:28 +, Laszlo Papp a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Laszlo, > > > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:13:37 +, Laszlo Papp wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > >> > Additionally, dashes are

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Laszlo, > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:13:37 +, Laszlo Papp wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> > Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon >> > device names. >> >> Also, where is that

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Laszlo, > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:13:37 +, Laszlo Papp wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> > Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon >> > device names. >> >> Also, where is that

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Hi Laszlo, On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:13:37 +, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon device names. Also, where

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Hi Laszlo, On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:13:37 +, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon device names. Also, where

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Jean Delvare
Le Tuesday 11 February 2014 à 08:28 +, Laszlo Papp a écrit : On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Hi Laszlo, On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:13:37 +, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Additionally,

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon device names. Also, where is that documented? In Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface: * * Global attributes *

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon device names. Also, where is that documented? In Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface:

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Le Tuesday 11 February 2014 à 08:28 +, Laszlo Papp a écrit : On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Hi Laszlo, On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:13:37 +, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Feb 10,

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon device names. Also,

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon device names. Also, where is that documented? In Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface: * * Global attributes *

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon device names. Also, where is that documented? In

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Lee Jones
Time to revisit this decision So, based on the fact that children device names usually contain dashes, I do not understand why hwmon would be any special in this regard. It is possible that the hwmon developers have not faced much MFD situation before, and so, this was not

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon device names. Also, where is that documented? In Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface:

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon device names. Also,

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: Time to revisit this decision So, based on the fact that children device names usually contain dashes, I do not understand why hwmon would be any special in this regard. It is possible that the hwmon developers

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Laszlo, On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:13:37 +, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon > > device names. > > Also, where is that documented? In Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface:

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:59:55PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote: >> I think I'll let Jean handle this one. > > Guys, please be a bit more definite. > > We should get over this long

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:59:55PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote: > I think I'll let Jean handle this one. Guys, please be a bit more definite. We should get over this long ping-pong game. It has been clearly stated that either way is fine,

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon > device names. Also, where is that documented? I do not think you can make such a decision, and you will realize that once you begin to think a bit out of the box and look around. See

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:59:55PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:53 PM, wrote: > > Quoting Jean Delvare : > > > >> > >> That being said, going with MFD in this case seems quite overkill to > >> me. MFD makes a lot of sense when each function has its own resources. > >> As

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:53 PM, wrote: > Quoting Jean Delvare : > >> >> That being said, going with MFD in this case seems quite overkill to >> me. MFD makes a lot of sense when each function has its own resources. >> As this isn't the case here, a single driver registering both an hwmon >>

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Jean Delvare
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:27:07 +, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:58:53 +, Lee Jones wrote: > >> > > Might be worth taking the opportunity to swap out these magic numbers > >> > > now. > >> > > >> > There's nothing magic

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Lee Jones
> > > > > > Might be worth taking the opportunity to swap out these magic > > > > > > numbers > > > > > > now. > > > > > > > > > > There's nothing magic about them, they tell the driver how many fans > > > > > each device supports. If you don't pass them as driver_data you'll > > > > > have > >

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Jean Delvare
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:01:59 +, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > Might be worth taking the opportunity to swap out these magic numbers > > > > > now. > > > > > > > > There's nothing magic about them, they tell the driver how many fans > > > > each device supports. If you don't pass them as

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> Hi Lee, Laszlo, >> >> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:08:42 +, Lee Jones wrote: >>> > In the preparation of creating an mfd driver and then refactor this one >>> > into a >>> > platform

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Lee, Laszlo, > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:08:42 +, Lee Jones wrote: >> > In the preparation of creating an mfd driver and then refactor this one >> > into a >> > platform driver in order to add some pinctrl functionality to the chip, it

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Lee Jones
> > > static const struct i2c_device_id max6650_id[] = { > > > - { "max6650", 1 }, > > > - { "max6651", 4 }, > > > + { "max6650-hwmon", 1 }, > > > + { "max6651-hwmon", 4 }, > > No, this is not acceptable, sorry. This will change the name of the > hwmon device as seen from user-space, breaking

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread linux
Quoting Jean Delvare : That being said, going with MFD in this case seems quite overkill to me. MFD makes a lot of sense when each function has its own resources. As this isn't the case here, a single driver registering both an hwmon interface and a pinctrl interface would seem sufficient to

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Lee, Laszlo, On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:08:42 +, Lee Jones wrote: > > In the preparation of creating an mfd driver and then refactor this one > > into a > > platform driver in order to add some pinctrl functionality to the chip, it > > is > > necessary to start the series with this change so

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Lee, Laszlo, On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:08:42 +, Lee Jones wrote: In the preparation of creating an mfd driver and then refactor this one into a platform driver in order to add some pinctrl functionality to the chip, it is necessary to start the series with this change so that the

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread linux
Quoting Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de: That being said, going with MFD in this case seems quite overkill to me. MFD makes a lot of sense when each function has its own resources. As this isn't the case here, a single driver registering both an hwmon interface and a pinctrl interface would seem

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Lee Jones
static const struct i2c_device_id max6650_id[] = { - { max6650, 1 }, - { max6651, 4 }, + { max6650-hwmon, 1 }, + { max6651-hwmon, 4 }, No, this is not acceptable, sorry. This will change the name of the hwmon device as seen from user-space, breaking any configuration file

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Hi Lee, Laszlo, On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:08:42 +, Lee Jones wrote: In the preparation of creating an mfd driver and then refactor this one into a platform driver in order to add some pinctrl functionality to the

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Hi Lee, Laszlo, On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:08:42 +, Lee Jones wrote: In the preparation of creating an mfd driver and then refactor this one into a

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Jean Delvare
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:01:59 +, Lee Jones wrote: Might be worth taking the opportunity to swap out these magic numbers now. There's nothing magic about them, they tell the driver how many fans each device supports. If you don't pass them as driver_data you'll have to

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Lee Jones
Might be worth taking the opportunity to swap out these magic numbers now. There's nothing magic about them, they tell the driver how many fans each device supports. If you don't pass them as driver_data you'll have to derive them from the device name

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Jean Delvare
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:27:07 +, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:58:53 +, Lee Jones wrote: Might be worth taking the opportunity to swap out these magic numbers now. There's nothing magic about

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:53 PM, li...@roeck-us.net wrote: Quoting Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de: That being said, going with MFD in this case seems quite overkill to me. MFD makes a lot of sense when each function has its own resources. As this isn't the case here, a single driver

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:59:55PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:53 PM, li...@roeck-us.net wrote: Quoting Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de: That being said, going with MFD in this case seems quite overkill to me. MFD makes a lot of sense when each function has its

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon device names. Also, where is that documented? I do not think you can make such a decision, and you will realize that once you begin to think a bit out of the box and

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:59:55PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote: I think I'll let Jean handle this one. Guys, please be a bit more definite. We should get over this long ping-pong game. It has been clearly stated that either

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:59:55PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote: I think I'll let Jean handle this one. Guys, please be a bit more definite. We should get

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to contain the hwmon suffix

2014-02-10 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Laszlo, On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:13:37 +, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote: Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon device names. Also, where is that documented? In Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface: