Alan Cox writes:
> And just how is he going to test it ? Considering he was just
> asking if the concept was reasonable I think you are a little out
> of order
I can't test every platform when I have to make such changes.
But it always serves to show the port maintainer "what" the
change
On Tue, 8 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> That's pretty arrogant that cut and pasting a few lines into some
> architecture specific files and reporting the updated patch is too
> much to ask.
I'm sorry if you find me arrogant -- that certainly was not my intent. I
did look at the files and
> > Thanks for your response, though -- maybe there is someone interested,
> > after all.
>
> That's pretty arrogant that cut and pasting a few lines into some
> architecture specific files and reporting the updated patch is too
> much to ask.
And just how is he going to test it ?
Czesc,
Maciej W. Rozycki writes:
> Yep, I know (ia64 and sparc*). But being lazy enough (and being short on
> time) I won't do it until I know the idea of the change is accepted. I'm
> sorry -- I sent previous versions of the patch twice since last Summer
> with no response at all and
On Tue, 8 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> There are several get_unmapped_area() implementations besides the
> standard one (search for HAVE_ARCH_UNMAPPED_AREA). Please fix
> them up too.
Yep, I know (ia64 and sparc*). But being lazy enough (and being short on
time) I won't do it until I
Alan Cox writes:
And just how is he going to test it ? Considering he was just
asking if the concept was reasonable I think you are a little out
of order
I can't test every platform when I have to make such changes.
But it always serves to show the port maintainer what the
change was.
On Tue, 8 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
That's pretty arrogant that cut and pasting a few lines into some
architecture specific files and reporting the updated patch is too
much to ask.
I'm sorry if you find me arrogant -- that certainly was not my intent. I
did look at the files and
On Tue, 8 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
There are several get_unmapped_area() implementations besides the
standard one (search for HAVE_ARCH_UNMAPPED_AREA). Please fix
them up too.
Yep, I know (ia64 and sparc*). But being lazy enough (and being short on
time) I won't do it until I know
Thanks for your response, though -- maybe there is someone interested,
after all.
That's pretty arrogant that cut and pasting a few lines into some
architecture specific files and reporting the updated patch is too
much to ask.
And just how is he going to test it ? Considering he
Czesc,
Maciej W. Rozycki writes:
Yep, I know (ia64 and sparc*). But being lazy enough (and being short on
time) I won't do it until I know the idea of the change is accepted. I'm
sorry -- I sent previous versions of the patch twice since last Summer
with no response at all and doing
10 matches
Mail list logo
