> On 03 Mar 2005 03:21:56 -0500, Jes Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Jes> mempool on the other hand will first try and call the user
Jes> provided allocation function and only if that fails try and
Jes> take memory from the pool, this will force us to convert pages
Jes> from cached
On 03 Mar 2005 03:21:56 -0500, Jes Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jes mempool on the other hand will first try and call the user
Jes provided allocation function and only if that fails try and
Jes take memory from the pool, this will force us to convert pages
Jes from cached to
> "David" == David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> At the risk of asking the obvious: what's preventing genalloc
David> to be implemented in terms of mempool?
David,
Taking another look at mempool, there's several reasons why mempool
isn't well suited for this job.
Basically
David == David Mosberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David At the risk of asking the obvious: what's preventing genalloc
David to be implemented in terms of mempool?
David,
Taking another look at mempool, there's several reasons why mempool
isn't well suited for this job.
Basically for the
At the risk of asking the obvious: what's preventing genalloc to be
implemented in terms of mempool?
--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
At the risk of asking the obvious: what's preventing genalloc to be
implemented in terms of mempool?
--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
6 matches
Mail list logo
