On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 14:06 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 01:23:51AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > Assuming tip is included in linux-next as of july 8, yes.
> Try one which has http://git.kernel.org/tip/81c2949f7fdcf8ff681326669a
> fde24962232670
That commit isn't
On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 14:06 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 01:23:51AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > Assuming tip is included in linux-next as of july 8, yes.
> Try one which has http://git.kernel.org/tip/81c2949f7fdcf8ff681326669a
> fde24962232670
That commit isn't
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 01:23:51AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Assuming tip is included in linux-next as of july 8, yes.
Try one which has
http://git.kernel.org/tip/81c2949f7fdcf8ff681326669afde24962232670
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 01:23:51AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Assuming tip is included in linux-next as of july 8, yes.
Try one which has
http://git.kernel.org/tip/81c2949f7fdcf8ff681326669afde24962232670
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 08:49 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 10:56:55AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > defconfigs both with and without CONFIG_PRINTK build
> > properly with the proposed change to this specific patch.
> Did you try latest tip/master?
Assuming tip is
On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 08:49 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 10:56:55AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > defconfigs both with and without CONFIG_PRINTK build
> > properly with the proposed change to this specific patch.
> Did you try latest tip/master?
Assuming tip is
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 10:56:55AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> defconfigs both with and without CONFIG_PRINTK build
> properly with the proposed change to this specific patch.
Did you try latest tip/master?
> Borislav, your delightful personality always impresses.
> Never change.
What goes
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 10:56:55AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> defconfigs both with and without CONFIG_PRINTK build
> properly with the proposed change to this specific patch.
Did you try latest tip/master?
> Borislav, your delightful personality always impresses.
> Never change.
What goes
On Sat, 2016-07-09 at 09:50 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 07:40:48PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > This change isn't described in the commit message and there
> > doesn't seem to be a need to change this.
> How do *you* know? Did *you* actually sit down and build a kernel
On Sat, 2016-07-09 at 09:50 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 07:40:48PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > This change isn't described in the commit message and there
> > doesn't seem to be a need to change this.
> How do *you* know? Did *you* actually sit down and build a kernel
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 07:40:48PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> This change isn't described in the commit message and there
> doesn't seem to be a need to change this.
How do *you* know? Did *you* actually sit down and build a kernel with
your proposed change before sending a reply?
I'm pretty
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 07:40:48PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> This change isn't described in the commit message and there
> doesn't seem to be a need to change this.
How do *you* know? Did *you* actually sit down and build a kernel with
your proposed change before sending a reply?
I'm pretty
On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 05:08 -0700, tip-bot for Borislav Petkov wrote:
> printk: Make the printk*once() variants return a value
[]
> diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h
[]
> @@ -108,11 +108,14 @@ struct va_format {
> * Dummy printk for disabled debugging statements to use
On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 05:08 -0700, tip-bot for Borislav Petkov wrote:
> printk: Make the printk*once() variants return a value
[]
> diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h
[]
> @@ -108,11 +108,14 @@ struct va_format {
> * Dummy printk for disabled debugging statements to use
14 matches
Mail list logo
