Acked-by: Hirokazu Takata
Al, many thanks for your great job.
P.S. I'm struggling to reconstruct and repair my m32r test environment...
-- Takata
From: Al Viro
Subject: Re: [update] Re: new execve/kernel_thread design
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:23:58 +
> Current situation:
>
&g
Acked-by: Hirokazu Takata tak...@linux-m32r.org
Al, many thanks for your great job.
P.S. I'm struggling to reconstruct and repair my m32r test environment...
-- Takata
From: Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [update] Re: new execve/kernel_thread design
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:23
On 12/7/2012 5:23 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> Current situation:
>
> * most of the architectures are OK - alpha arm arm64 c6x frv hexagon ia64 m68k
> microblaze mips openrisc parisc sparc s390 tile um unicore32 x86 xtensa
>
> * powerpc *still* awaits an ACK from maintainers; no reports of any breakage
>
Current situation:
* most of the architectures are OK - alpha arm arm64 c6x frv hexagon ia64 m68k
microblaze mips openrisc parisc sparc s390 tile um unicore32 x86 xtensa
* powerpc *still* awaits an ACK from maintainers; no reports of any breakage
on linux-next and seems to be doing fine on my
Current situation:
* most of the architectures are OK - alpha arm arm64 c6x frv hexagon ia64 m68k
microblaze mips openrisc parisc sparc s390 tile um unicore32 x86 xtensa
* powerpc *still* awaits an ACK from maintainers; no reports of any breakage
on linux-next and seems to be doing fine on my
On 12/7/2012 5:23 PM, Al Viro wrote:
Current situation:
* most of the architectures are OK - alpha arm arm64 c6x frv hexagon ia64 m68k
microblaze mips openrisc parisc sparc s390 tile um unicore32 x86 xtensa
* powerpc *still* awaits an ACK from maintainers; no reports of any breakage
on
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:38:23PM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:25:21 +
> Al Viro wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> >
> > > Oops, sorry. I tested this weeks ago but it seems I never wrote a mail to
> > > indicate
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:25:21 +
Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> > Oops, sorry. I tested this weeks ago but it seems I never wrote a mail to
> > indicate success. The current git kernel works just fine.
>
> "Current git" being what?
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> Oops, sorry. I tested this weeks ago but it seems I never wrote a mail to
> indicate success. The current git kernel works just fine.
"Current git" being what? Linus' tree? linux-next? signal.git#arch-s390?
FWIW, the
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:31:07 +0100
Al Viro wrote:
> The situation got much better by now. More than a half of
> architectures are done - alpha arm arm64 c6x hexagon ia64 m68k mips openrisc
> parisc sparc tile um unicore32 and x86.
>
> Two more avait ACKs from maintainers - powerpc
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:31:07 +0100
Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
The situation got much better by now. More than a half of
architectures are done - alpha arm arm64 c6x hexagon ia64 m68k mips openrisc
parisc sparc tile um unicore32 and x86.
Two more avait ACKs from
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
Oops, sorry. I tested this weeks ago but it seems I never wrote a mail to
indicate success. The current git kernel works just fine.
Current git being what? Linus' tree? linux-next? signal.git#arch-s390?
FWIW, the relevant
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:25:21 +
Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
Oops, sorry. I tested this weeks ago but it seems I never wrote a mail to
indicate success. The current git kernel works just fine.
Current git
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:38:23PM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:25:21 +
Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
Oops, sorry. I tested this weeks ago but it seems I never wrote a mail to
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 07:31:07PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> The situation got much better by now. More than a half of
> architectures are done - alpha arm arm64 c6x hexagon ia64 m68k mips openrisc
> parisc sparc tile um unicore32 and x86.
>
> Two more avait ACKs from maintainers -
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 07:31:07PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
The situation got much better by now. More than a half of
architectures are done - alpha arm arm64 c6x hexagon ia64 m68k mips openrisc
parisc sparc tile um unicore32 and x86.
Two more avait ACKs from maintainers - powerpc
16 matches
Mail list logo
