On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Mathias Nyman
wrote:
> On 06.06.2017 09:33, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Mathias Nyman
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05.06.2017 15:57, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Jun
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Mathias Nyman
wrote:
> On 06.06.2017 09:33, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Mathias Nyman
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05.06.2017 15:57, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Mathias Nyman
wrote:
>
On 06.06.2017 09:33, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Mathias Nyman wrote:
On 05.06.2017 15:57, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Mathias Nyman
wrote:
On 20.05.2017 10:24, Thang Q. Nguyen
On 06.06.2017 09:33, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Mathias Nyman wrote:
On 05.06.2017 15:57, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Mathias Nyman
wrote:
On 20.05.2017 10:24, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
XHCI specification 1.1 does not require xHCI 1.0
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 05.06.2017 15:57, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Mathias Nyman
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20.05.2017 10:24, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
XHCI
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 05.06.2017 15:57, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Mathias Nyman
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20.05.2017 10:24, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
XHCI specification 1.1 does not require xHCI 1.0 compliant
On 05.06.2017 15:57, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Mathias Nyman
wrote:
On 20.05.2017 10:24, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
XHCI specification 1.1 does not require xHCI 1.0 compliant controllers
to always enable hardware USB2 LPM.
However, the
On 05.06.2017 15:57, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Mathias Nyman
wrote:
On 20.05.2017 10:24, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
XHCI specification 1.1 does not require xHCI 1.0 compliant controllers
to always enable hardware USB2 LPM.
However, the current xHCI driver always
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Mathias Nyman
wrote:
> On 20.05.2017 10:24, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> XHCI specification 1.1 does not require xHCI 1.0 compliant controllers
>> to always enable hardware USB2 LPM.
>> However, the current xHCI driver always enable
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Mathias Nyman
wrote:
> On 20.05.2017 10:24, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> XHCI specification 1.1 does not require xHCI 1.0 compliant controllers
>> to always enable hardware USB2 LPM.
>> However, the current xHCI driver always enable it by setting HLE=1 when
>>
On 20.05.2017 10:24, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
XHCI specification 1.1 does not require xHCI 1.0 compliant controllers
to always enable hardware USB2 LPM.
However, the current xHCI driver always enable it by setting HLE=1 when
seeing HLC=1. This makes certain xHCI controllers that have broken USB2
On 20.05.2017 10:24, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
XHCI specification 1.1 does not require xHCI 1.0 compliant controllers
to always enable hardware USB2 LPM.
However, the current xHCI driver always enable it by setting HLE=1 when
seeing HLC=1. This makes certain xHCI controllers that have broken USB2
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 02:24:56PM +0700, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
> XHCI specification 1.1 does not require xHCI 1.0 compliant controllers
> to always enable hardware USB2 LPM.
> However, the current xHCI driver always enable it by setting HLE=1 when
> seeing HLC=1. This makes certain xHCI
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 02:24:56PM +0700, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
> XHCI specification 1.1 does not require xHCI 1.0 compliant controllers
> to always enable hardware USB2 LPM.
> However, the current xHCI driver always enable it by setting HLE=1 when
> seeing HLC=1. This makes certain xHCI
14 matches
Mail list logo