On 11/1/07, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/1/07, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thank you. Maybe we can start by the applied debug patch :-)
>
> Will applied it and try to recreate this.
Patch applied, used emerge to install a 2.6.24-rc1 kernel.
I had no complete
On 11/1/07, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 04:22:10PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > Since 2.6.23-mm1 I also experience strange hangs during heavy writeouts.
> > Each time I noticed this I was using emerge (package util from the
> > gentoo distribution) to
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 04:22:10PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On 10/22/07, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:10:45PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > Hmm, Maybe it's an reiserfs related issue. Do you have the full log file?
> >
> > Bingo! It can be
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 04:22:10PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
On 10/22/07, Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:10:45PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hmm, Maybe it's an reiserfs related issue. Do you have the full log file?
Bingo! It can be reproduced in -mm
On 11/1/07, Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 04:22:10PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
Since 2.6.23-mm1 I also experience strange hangs during heavy writeouts.
Each time I noticed this I was using emerge (package util from the
gentoo distribution) to
On 11/1/07, Torsten Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/1/07, Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you. Maybe we can start by the applied debug patch :-)
Will applied it and try to recreate this.
Patch applied, used emerge to install a 2.6.24-rc1 kernel.
I had no complete stalls,
On 10/22/07, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:10:45PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > Hmm, Maybe it's an reiserfs related issue. Do you have the full log file?
>
> Bingo! It can be reproduced in -mm on reiserfs:
>
> # mkfs.reiserfs /dev/sdb1
> # mount /dev/sdb1
On 10/22/07, Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:10:45PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hmm, Maybe it's an reiserfs related issue. Do you have the full log file?
Bingo! It can be reproduced in -mm on reiserfs:
# mkfs.reiserfs /dev/sdb1
# mount /dev/sdb1 /test
#
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:10:45PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hmm, Maybe it's an reiserfs related issue. Do you have the full log file?
Bingo! It can be reproduced in -mm on reiserfs:
# mkfs.reiserfs /dev/sdb1
# mount /dev/sdb1 /test
# cp bin /test
# dmesg
[...]
[ 418.346113] requeue_io
On Monday 22 October 2007 15:10:45 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:05:35PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Thank you very much too, for helping me.
>
> You are welcome :-)
>
> > Applied.
> > Had to kill klogd, since kernel generates tons of redirtied inode messages.
> >
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:05:35PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you very much too, for helping me.
You are welcome :-)
> Applied.
> Had to kill klogd, since kernel generates tons of redirtied inode messages.
> Size of the kern.log is 863 KB, thus I I don't think it is polite to
On Monday 22 October 2007 14:37:07 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:21:21PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > I Bisected this bug to exactly this commit:
> >
> > 2e6883bdf49abd0e7f0d9b6297fc3be7ebb2250b
> > writeback: introduce writeback_control.more_io to indicate more io
> >
> >
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:21:21PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> I Bisected this bug to exactly this commit:
>
> 2e6883bdf49abd0e7f0d9b6297fc3be7ebb2250b
> writeback: introduce writeback_control.more_io to indicate more io
>
> Reverting it and compiling latest git shows no more signs of that
On Monday 22 October 2007 13:19:08 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:58:11PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Monday 22 October 2007 12:55:25 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:40:24PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > > On Monday 22 October 2007 12:22:10 Peter
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:58:11PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Monday 22 October 2007 12:55:25 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:40:24PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > On Monday 22 October 2007 12:22:10 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > [ 673.365631] pdflush D
On Monday 22 October 2007 12:55:25 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:40:24PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Monday 22 October 2007 12:22:10 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > [ 673.365631] pdflush D c21bdecc 0 221 2
> > > > [ 673.365635]c21bdee0 0046
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:40:24PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Monday 22 October 2007 12:22:10 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > [ 673.365631] pdflush D c21bdecc 0 221 2
> > > [ 673.365635]c21bdee0 0046 0002 c21bdecc c21bdec4
> > > c21b3000 0002
> >
On Monday 22 October 2007 12:22:10 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 11:59 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Monday 22 October 2007 11:41:57 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 08:22 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I found a bug in current
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 11:59 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Monday 22 October 2007 11:41:57 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 08:22 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I found a bug in current -git:
> > >
> > > On my system on of cpus stays 100% in iowait mode (I
On Monday 22 October 2007 11:41:57 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 08:22 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found a bug in current -git:
> >
> > On my system on of cpus stays 100% in iowait mode (I have core 2 duo)
> > Otherwise the system works OK, no disk activity
On Monday 22 October 2007 11:11:52 Paolo Ornati wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:22:52 +0200
> Maxim Levitsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I tried to bisect this, but eventually I run into other bugs that cause
> > system to oops early.
>
> You can pick a different revision to test with:
>
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 08:22 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found a bug in current -git:
>
> On my system on of cpus stays 100% in iowait mode (I have core 2 duo)
> Otherwise the system works OK, no disk activity and/or slowdown.
> Suspecting that this is a swap-related problem I tried
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:22:52 +0200
Maxim Levitsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to bisect this, but eventually I run into other bugs that cause
> system to oops early.
You can pick a different revision to test with:
git-reset --hard "SHA1"
Choose one with "git-bisect
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:22:52 +0200
Maxim Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to bisect this, but eventually I run into other bugs that cause
system to oops early.
You can pick a different revision to test with:
git-reset --hard SHA1
Choose one with git-bisect visualize.
--
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 08:22 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi,
I found a bug in current -git:
On my system on of cpus stays 100% in iowait mode (I have core 2 duo)
Otherwise the system works OK, no disk activity and/or slowdown.
Suspecting that this is a swap-related problem I tried to turn
On Monday 22 October 2007 11:11:52 Paolo Ornati wrote:
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:22:52 +0200
Maxim Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to bisect this, but eventually I run into other bugs that cause
system to oops early.
You can pick a different revision to test with:
On Monday 22 October 2007 11:41:57 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 08:22 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi,
I found a bug in current -git:
On my system on of cpus stays 100% in iowait mode (I have core 2 duo)
Otherwise the system works OK, no disk activity and/or slowdown.
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 11:59 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007 11:41:57 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 08:22 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi,
I found a bug in current -git:
On my system on of cpus stays 100% in iowait mode (I have core 2 duo)
On Monday 22 October 2007 12:22:10 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 11:59 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007 11:41:57 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 08:22 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi,
I found a bug in current -git:
On my
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:40:24PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007 12:22:10 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[ 673.365631] pdflush D c21bdecc 0 221 2
[ 673.365635]c21bdee0 0046 0002 c21bdecc c21bdec4
c21b3000 0002
[
On Monday 22 October 2007 12:55:25 Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:40:24PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007 12:22:10 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[ 673.365631] pdflush D c21bdecc 0 221 2
[ 673.365635]c21bdee0 0046 0002
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:58:11PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007 12:55:25 Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:40:24PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007 12:22:10 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[ 673.365631] pdflush D c21bdecc 0
On Monday 22 October 2007 13:19:08 Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:58:11PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007 12:55:25 Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:40:24PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007 12:22:10 Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:21:21PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
I Bisected this bug to exactly this commit:
2e6883bdf49abd0e7f0d9b6297fc3be7ebb2250b
writeback: introduce writeback_control.more_io to indicate more io
Reverting it and compiling latest git shows no more signs of that bug.
On Monday 22 October 2007 14:37:07 Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:21:21PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
I Bisected this bug to exactly this commit:
2e6883bdf49abd0e7f0d9b6297fc3be7ebb2250b
writeback: introduce writeback_control.more_io to indicate more io
Reverting it
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:05:35PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi,
Thank you very much too, for helping me.
You are welcome :-)
Applied.
Had to kill klogd, since kernel generates tons of redirtied inode messages.
Size of the kern.log is 863 KB, thus I I don't think it is polite to
On Monday 22 October 2007 15:10:45 Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:05:35PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi,
Thank you very much too, for helping me.
You are welcome :-)
Applied.
Had to kill klogd, since kernel generates tons of redirtied inode messages.
Size of the
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:10:45PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hmm, Maybe it's an reiserfs related issue. Do you have the full log file?
Bingo! It can be reproduced in -mm on reiserfs:
# mkfs.reiserfs /dev/sdb1
# mount /dev/sdb1 /test
# cp bin /test
wait for a while
# dmesg
[...]
[ 418.346113]
38 matches
Mail list logo
