On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, David Woodhouse wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > If open source people knew how it worked they might do horrible evil
> > things like TV-out with the macrovision turned off. Thats basically
> > the root of all this - yet again its the US movie industry
>
> Er... have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> If open source people knew how it worked they might do horrible evil
> things like TV-out with the macrovision turned off. Thats basically
> the root of all this - yet again its the US movie industry
Er... have you tried recording from the G400 TV out with matroxfb?
> > the standard corporate excuse whenever they don't want to do something
> > "Intelectual Property concerns".)
If open source people knew how it worked they might do horrible evil things
like TV-out with the macrovision turned off. Thats basically the root of all
this - yet again its the US
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Both drivers want Matrox's HALlib. (Which is x86 binary only.) Matrox
> will not release the info on that interface to the chipset. (Using
> the standard corporate excuse whenever they don't want to do something
> "Intelectual Property concerns".)
> Good luck on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Both drivers want Matrox's HALlib. (Which is x86 binary only.) Matrox
will not release the info on that interface to the chipset. (Using
the standard corporate excuse whenever they don't want to do something
"Intelectual Property concerns".)
Good luck on getting
the standard corporate excuse whenever they don't want to do something
"Intelectual Property concerns".)
If open source people knew how it worked they might do horrible evil things
like TV-out with the macrovision turned off. Thats basically the root of all
this - yet again its the US movie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If open source people knew how it worked they might do horrible evil
things like TV-out with the macrovision turned off. Thats basically
the root of all this - yet again its the US movie industry
Er... have you tried recording from the G400 TV out with matroxfb?
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, David Woodhouse wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If open source people knew how it worked they might do horrible evil
things like TV-out with the macrovision turned off. Thats basically
the root of all this - yet again its the US movie industry
Er... have you tried
replying to myself..
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Paul Jakma wrote:
> why put in mga specific code?
last time i asked why 2x74x hardware iommu wasn't supported i was told
something along the lines of cause generic kernel driver interfaces
wouldn't support it. so support for the alpha hardware would
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Alex Deucher wrote:
> There is preliminary support for pcigart in the dri tree. I believe
> some people have had some success with it.
but there doesn't need to be. DEC 2x17x Alpha chipsets have an IOMMU
for hardware scatter-gather support. (ie generic agpgart for the PCI
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 8 Feb 01 at 13:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Jeff Hartmann wrote:
> > > Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>
> > > It does not use dynamic DMA mapping, because it doesn't do PCI DMA at
> > > all. It uses AGP DMA. Actually, it shouldn't be too hard to get it to
There is preliminary support for pcigart in the dri tree. I believe
some people have had some success with it.
Alex
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>
> On 8 Feb 01 at 13:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Jeff Hartmann wrote:
> > > Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>
> > > It does not use dynamic DMA mapping, because
On 8 Feb 01 at 13:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Jeff Hartmann wrote:
> > Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > It does not use dynamic DMA mapping, because it doesn't do PCI DMA at
> > all. It uses AGP DMA. Actually, it shouldn't be too hard to get it to
> > work on the Alpha (just a few 32/64 bit issues
Jeff Hartmann wrote:
>
> Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>
> > On 8 Feb 01 at 12:15, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> >> I wasn't talking about the drm driver I was talking about programming
> >> the PCI controller directly using setpci 1.0.0 or some such
> >> command, I can't remember off hand. Which
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 8 Feb 01 at 12:15, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
>> I wasn't talking about the drm driver I was talking about programming
>> the PCI controller directly using setpci 1.0.0 or some such
>> command, I can't remember off hand. Which turns on busmastering if it
>> is off
On 8 Feb 01 at 12:15, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I wasn't talking about the drm driver I was talking about programming
> the PCI controller directly using setpci 1.0.0 or some such
> command, I can't remember off hand. Which turns on busmastering if it
> is off for a particular device.
OK.
I wasn't talking about the drm driver I was talking about programming
the PCI controller directly using setpci 1.0.0 or some such
command, I can't remember off hand. Which turns on busmastering if it
is off for a particular device.
Alex
Jeff Hartmann wrote:
>
> Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> >
Alex Deucher wrote:
> I'm not sure about the mga source, but you can enable busmaster manually
> as root. See the dri-devel list for more. I can't remember the exact
> message off hand. THere was also some discussion of this last week I
> think.
>
> Alex
>
>
>
I'm not sure about the mga source, but you can enable busmaster manually
as root. See the dri-devel list for more. I can't remember the exact
message off hand. THere was also some discussion of this last week I
think.
Alex
Hi,
friend of mine bought g400 on
I'm not sure about the mga source, but you can enable busmaster manually
as root. See the dri-devel list for more. I can't remember the exact
message off hand. THere was also some discussion of this last week I
think.
Alex
Hi,
friend of mine bought g400 on
I wasn't talking about the drm driver I was talking about programming
the PCI controller directly using setpci 1.0.0 or some such
command, I can't remember off hand. Which turns on busmastering if it
is off for a particular device.
Alex
Jeff Hartmann wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
I'm
On 8 Feb 01 at 12:15, Alex Deucher wrote:
I wasn't talking about the drm driver I was talking about programming
the PCI controller directly using setpci 1.0.0 or some such
command, I can't remember off hand. Which turns on busmastering if it
is off for a particular device.
OK.
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
On 8 Feb 01 at 12:15, Alex Deucher wrote:
I wasn't talking about the drm driver I was talking about programming
the PCI controller directly using setpci 1.0.0 or some such
command, I can't remember off hand. Which turns on busmastering if it
is off for a
Jeff Hartmann wrote:
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
On 8 Feb 01 at 12:15, Alex Deucher wrote:
I wasn't talking about the drm driver I was talking about programming
the PCI controller directly using setpci 1.0.0 or some such
command, I can't remember off hand. Which turns on
On 8 Feb 01 at 13:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
Jeff Hartmann wrote:
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
It does not use dynamic DMA mapping, because it doesn't do PCI DMA at
all. It uses AGP DMA. Actually, it shouldn't be too hard to get it to
work on the Alpha (just a few 32/64 bit issues probably.)
There is preliminary support for pcigart in the dri tree. I believe
some people have had some success with it.
Alex
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
On 8 Feb 01 at 13:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
Jeff Hartmann wrote:
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
It does not use dynamic DMA mapping, because it doesn't
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
On 8 Feb 01 at 13:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
Jeff Hartmann wrote:
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
It does not use dynamic DMA mapping, because it doesn't do PCI DMA at
all. It uses AGP DMA. Actually, it shouldn't be too hard to get it to
work on
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Alex Deucher wrote:
There is preliminary support for pcigart in the dri tree. I believe
some people have had some success with it.
but there doesn't need to be. DEC 2x17x Alpha chipsets have an IOMMU
for hardware scatter-gather support. (ie generic agpgart for the PCI
replying to myself..
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Paul Jakma wrote:
why put in mga specific code?
last time i asked why 2x74x hardware iommu wasn't supported i was told
something along the lines of cause generic kernel driver interfaces
wouldn't support it. so support for the alpha hardware would
29 matches
Mail list logo
