On Tuesday December 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Seeing this oops on 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 intermittently on bootup. Also, when
> this doesn't happen it seems like udev goes crazy adding and removing
> /dev/md0 over and over using up a ton of CPU. Is this a known problem?
> This also happened with
On Tuesday December 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seeing this oops on 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 intermittently on bootup. Also, when
this doesn't happen it seems like udev goes crazy adding and removing
/dev/md0 over and over using up a ton of CPU. Is this a known problem?
This also happened with -mm1.
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Neil Brown wrote:
> > OK, so more details follow (I am not sure how valuable they are, though).
> They do help a bit..
> I've found a possible race that could possibly be related to this BUG.
> Can you try this patch and see if it helps?
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Neil Brown wrote:
OK, so more details follow (I am not sure how valuable they are, though).
They do help a bit..
I've found a possible race that could possibly be related to this BUG.
Can you try this patch and see if it helps?
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL
On Tuesday December 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> > It seemed to be 100% reproducible - happened on every boot of FC6
> > system, so it was probably triggered by some raid/lvm command executed
> > from init scripts after boot, but I didn't examine it
On Tuesday December 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Jiri Kosina wrote:
It seemed to be 100% reproducible - happened on every boot of FC6
system, so it was probably triggered by some raid/lvm command executed
from init scripts after boot, but I didn't examine it further.
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> It seemed to be 100% reproducible - happened on every boot of FC6
> system, so it was probably triggered by some raid/lvm command executed
> from init scripts after boot, but I didn't examine it further. As soon
> as I get to the machine where this
On Tuesday, 5 December 2006 23:07, Auke Kok wrote:
> [resend]
>
> Quick note: I loaded up 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 on a platform here and noticed that
> the onboard
> e1000 NIC was enumerated to eth1 instead of eth0. on 2.6.18.5 and any other
> kernel I
> used before, it was properly named eth0 after
On Tuesday, 5 December 2006 23:07, Auke Kok wrote:
[resend]
Quick note: I loaded up 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 on a platform here and noticed that
the onboard
e1000 NIC was enumerated to eth1 instead of eth0. on 2.6.18.5 and any other
kernel I
used before, it was properly named eth0 after startup.
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Jiri Kosina wrote:
It seemed to be 100% reproducible - happened on every boot of FC6
system, so it was probably triggered by some raid/lvm command executed
from init scripts after boot, but I didn't examine it further. As soon
as I get to the machine where this happens,
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Neil Brown wrote:
> As Andrew correctly pointed out, this bit error is not a RAM problem. It
> is actually the low bit of a counter a spinlock that was decremented
> just before the WARN_ON. So it simply indicates that the inode had
> already been freed, which I think we
On Tuesday December 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I notice it says:
> |
> v
> > 090: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b
> > Single bit error detected. Probably bad RAM.
> > Run memtest86+ or a similar memory test tool.
>
> Have you
On Wednesday November 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc6/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
>
> md-change-lifetime-rules-for-md-devices.patch gives me the following early
> during boot (first
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 02:08:28AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > [Trimmed the Cc list a bit.]
> >
> > On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:21:27 +0100
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki"
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 02:08:28AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[Trimmed the Cc list a bit.]
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:21:27 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL
On Wednesday November 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc6/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
md-change-lifetime-rules-for-md-devices.patch gives me the following early
during boot (first WARNING()
On Tuesday December 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice it says:
|
v
090: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b
Single bit error detected. Probably bad RAM.
Run memtest86+ or a similar memory test tool.
Have you tried running
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Neil Brown wrote:
As Andrew correctly pointed out, this bit error is not a RAM problem. It
is actually the low bit of a counter a spinlock that was decremented
just before the WARN_ON. So it simply indicates that the inode had
already been freed, which I think we knew
Avi Kivity wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:24:45 -0500
Thomas Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've found a couple of bugs so far...
1. I did `modprobe kvm' and then tried running a version of the KVM
Qemu
compiled for a different kernel. My mistake. But I got an
Avi Kivity wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:24:45 -0500
Thomas Tuttle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found a couple of bugs so far...
1. I did `modprobe kvm' and then tried running a version of the KVM
Qemu
compiled for a different kernel. My mistake. But I got an
On Friday 01 December 2006 23:09, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:19:00PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > On Friday 01 December 2006 19:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:33:21 -0500
> > > Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I booted without the
On Friday 01 December 2006 23:09, Akinobu Mita wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:19:00PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On Friday 01 December 2006 19:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:33:21 -0500
Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I booted without the video and vga
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:19:00PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On Friday 01 December 2006 19:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:33:21 -0500
> > Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I booted without the video and vga settings with earlyprintk=vga and got
> > >
On Friday 01 December 2006 19:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:33:21 -0500
> Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I booted without the video and vga settings with earlyprintk=vga and got
> > output. The
> > kenerl was complaining about a crc error. Checking the patch
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:33:21 -0500
Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I booted without the video and vga settings with earlyprintk=vga and got
> output. The
> kenerl was complaining about a crc error. Checking the patch list I found:
>
> crc32-replace-bitreverse-by-bitrev32.patch
>
>
Andrew,
I booted without the video and vga settings with earlyprintk=vga and got
output. The
kenerl was complaining about a crc error. Checking the patch list I found:
crc32-replace-bitreverse-by-bitrev32.patch
reversing this patch fixes booting here.
Please do not push this on - it breaks
On Friday, 1 December 2006 02:20, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 06:18:09PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:04:15 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > git-netdev-all.patch
> > > > > git-netdev-all-fixup.patch
> > > > >
Andrew,
I booted without the video and vga settings with earlyprintk=vga and got
output. The
kenerl was complaining about a crc error. Checking the patch list I found:
crc32-replace-bitreverse-by-bitrev32.patch
reversing this patch fixes booting here.
Please do not push this on - it breaks
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:33:21 -0500
Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I booted without the video and vga settings with earlyprintk=vga and got
output. The
kenerl was complaining about a crc error. Checking the patch list I found:
crc32-replace-bitreverse-by-bitrev32.patch
reversing
On Friday 01 December 2006 19:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:33:21 -0500
Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I booted without the video and vga settings with earlyprintk=vga and got
output. The
kenerl was complaining about a crc error. Checking the patch list I
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:19:00PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On Friday 01 December 2006 19:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:33:21 -0500
Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I booted without the video and vga settings with earlyprintk=vga and got
output. The
On Friday, 1 December 2006 02:20, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 06:18:09PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:04:15 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
git-netdev-all.patch
git-netdev-all-fixup.patch
libphy-dont-do-that.patch
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 02:08:28AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > [Trimmed the Cc list a bit.]
> >
> > On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:21:27 +0100
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki"
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 06:18:09PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:04:15 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > git-netdev-all.patch
> > > > git-netdev-all-fixup.patch
> > > > libphy-dont-do-that.patch
> > >
> > > Are you able to eliminate
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [Trimmed the Cc list a bit.]
>
> On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:21:27 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, 30 November 2006 02:04,
[Trimmed the Cc list a bit.]
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:21:27 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, 30 November 2006 02:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:26, Andrew
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:21:27 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 November 2006 02:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:08:21 +0100
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 02:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:08:21 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 23:10, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:42:20 -0500 Ed Tomlinson wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 28 November 2006 05:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > Will appear eventually at
> > >
> > >
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 23:10, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:42:20 -0500 Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 05:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
Will appear eventually at
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 02:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:08:21 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 29
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:21:27 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 02:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:08:21 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
[Trimmed the Cc list a bit.]
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:21:27 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 02:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[Trimmed the Cc list a bit.]
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:21:27 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 02:04, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 06:18:09PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:04:15 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
git-netdev-all.patch
git-netdev-all-fixup.patch
libphy-dont-do-that.patch
Are you able to eliminate libphy-dont-do-that.patch?
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 02:08:28AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[Trimmed the Cc list a bit.]
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 22:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:21:27 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:42:20 -0500 Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 November 2006 05:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Will appear eventually at
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc6/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
>
> This kernel does not boot here. It does not get
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 05:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Will appear eventually at
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc6/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
This kernel does not boot here. It does not get far enough to post anything to
my serial console.
The last booted
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:04:15 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > git-netdev-all.patch
> > > git-netdev-all-fixup.patch
> > > libphy-dont-do-that.patch
> >
> > Are you able to eliminate libphy-dont-do-that.patch?
> >
> > > Is a broken-out version of
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:08:21 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:30, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 29
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:08:21 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:30, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:08:00 +0100
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:30, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:08:00 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 20:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 22:54 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:30 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> When CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD is not set then this happens:
> >>>
> >>>
Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:30 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> When CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD is not set then this happens:
>>>
>>> CC kernel/module.o
>>> kernel/module.c:852: error: `initstate'
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:30, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:08:00 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 20:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 28 November 2006 11:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:08:00 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 20:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 28 November 2006 11:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > Temporarily at
> > >
> > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 20:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 November 2006 11:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
> >
> > Will appear eventually at
> >
> >
On Tuesday, 28 November 2006 11:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Temporarily at
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
>
> Will appear eventually at
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc6/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
A minor issue: on one of my (x86-64) test
Avi Kivity wrote:
Oh, and I get a ton of these messages with kvm:
rtc: lost some interrupts at 1024Hz.
I'll look into these too, though I'm not sure where.
Please try the attached patch and let us know.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Index:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:30 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > When CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD is not set then this happens:
> >
> > CC kernel/module.o
> > kernel/module.c:852: error: `initstate' undeclared here (not
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:30 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
Hello,
When CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD is not set then this happens:
CC kernel/module.o
kernel/module.c:852: error: `initstate' undeclared here (not in a
Avi Kivity wrote:
Oh, and I get a ton of these messages with kvm:
rtc: lost some interrupts at 1024Hz.
I'll look into these too, though I'm not sure where.
Please try the attached patch and let us know.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Index:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2006 11:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
Will appear eventually at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc6/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
A minor issue: on one of my (x86-64) test boxes
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 20:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2006 11:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
Will appear eventually at
Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:30 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
Hello,
When CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD is not set then this happens:
CC kernel/module.o
kernel/module.c:852: error: `initstate' undeclared here (not
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 22:54 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:30 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
Hello,
When CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD is not set then this happens:
CC kernel/module.o
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 05:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
Will appear eventually at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc6/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
This kernel does not boot here. It does not get far enough to post anything to
my serial console.
The last booted
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:42:20 -0500 Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 05:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
Will appear eventually at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc6/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
This kernel does not boot here. It does not get far
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:08:00 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 20:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2006 11:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
Will appear
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:30, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:08:00 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 20:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2006 11:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:30, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:08:00 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 20:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 28
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:08:21 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:30, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:08:00 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:08:21 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:30, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:04:15 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
git-netdev-all.patch
git-netdev-all-fixup.patch
libphy-dont-do-that.patch
Are you able to eliminate libphy-dont-do-that.patch?
Is a broken-out version of git-netdev-all.patch available from
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:24:45 -0500
Thomas Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've found a couple of bugs so far...
1. I did `modprobe kvm' and then tried running a version of the KVM Qemu
compiled for a different kernel. My mistake. But I got an oops:
BUG: unable to
Michael Raskin wrote:
I have a strange problem with 2.6.19-rc-mm kernels. After I load X, I
notice that memory is marked used at rate of tens of KB/s. Then it
Tried 2.6.19-rc6-mm2. Now the problem is gone. Sometimes memory is
getting maked used as before, but when the loss reaches a few MB's
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 04:58:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:24:45 -0500
> Thomas Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 2. I'm not sure if this bug is in the kernel, wireless tools, or the
> > ipw3945 driver, but I haven't changed the version of anything but the
> >
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc6/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
md-change-lifetime-rules-for-md-devices.patch gives me the following early
during boot (first WARNING() inside __mutex_lock_slowpath(), then BUG at
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:24:45 -0500
Thomas Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. I'm not sure if this bug is in the kernel, wireless tools, or the
> ipw3945 driver, but I haven't changed the version of anything but the
> kernel. When I do `iwconfig eth1 essid foobar' something drops the
> last
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:24:45 -0500
Thomas Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've found a couple of bugs so far...
>
> 1. I did `modprobe kvm' and then tried running a version of the KVM Qemu
> compiled for a different kernel. My mistake. But I got an oops:
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel
I've found a couple of bugs so far...
1. I did `modprobe kvm' and then tried running a version of the KVM Qemu
compiled for a different kernel. My mistake. But I got an oops:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0008
printing eip:
f91f9c3f
*pde =
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD is not set then this happens:
>
> CC kernel/module.o
> kernel/module.c:852: error: `initstate' undeclared here (not in a function)
> kernel/module.c:852: error: initializer
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:22:34PM -0800, Miles Lane wrote:
> I decided to try building a relocatable kernel. I don't know if this
> is why I got so many section mismatch errors.
>
> WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to
> .init.data:boot_params from .text between '_text' (at offset
I decided to try building a relocatable kernel. I don't know if this
is why I got so many section mismatch errors.
WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to
.init.data:boot_params from .text between '_text' (at offset
0xc0100036) and 'checkCPUtype'
WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch:
Hello,
Agrrh ... tab/spaces thing again. Sorry. Second try:
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2-a/kernel/module.c 2006-11-28 12:17:09.0
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2-b/kernel/module.c 2006-11-28 12:05:01.0
+0100
@@
Hello,
When CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD is not set then this happens:
CC kernel/module.o
kernel/module.c:852: error: `initstate' undeclared here (not in a function)
kernel/module.c:852: error: initializer element is not constant
kernel/module.c:852: error: (near initialization for
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:02:46AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> -input-make-serio_register_driver-return-error.patch
> -input-check-serio_register_driver-error.patch
> -input-change-to-gfp_kernel-for-serio_register_driver-event-allocation.patch
Please drop
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:02:46AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
-input-make-serio_register_driver-return-error.patch
-input-check-serio_register_driver-error.patch
-input-change-to-gfp_kernel-for-serio_register_driver-event-allocation.patch
Please drop
Hello,
When CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD is not set then this happens:
CC kernel/module.o
kernel/module.c:852: error: `initstate' undeclared here (not in a function)
kernel/module.c:852: error: initializer element is not constant
kernel/module.c:852: error: (near initialization for
Hello,
Agrrh ... tab/spaces thing again. Sorry. Second try:
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2-a/kernel/module.c 2006-11-28 12:17:09.0
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2-b/kernel/module.c 2006-11-28 12:05:01.0
+0100
@@
I decided to try building a relocatable kernel. I don't know if this
is why I got so many section mismatch errors.
WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to
.init.data:boot_params from .text between '_text' (at offset
0xc0100036) and 'checkCPUtype'
WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:22:34PM -0800, Miles Lane wrote:
I decided to try building a relocatable kernel. I don't know if this
is why I got so many section mismatch errors.
WARNING: vmlinux - Section mismatch: reference to
.init.data:boot_params from .text between '_text' (at offset
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
Hello,
When CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD is not set then this happens:
CC kernel/module.o
kernel/module.c:852: error: `initstate' undeclared here (not in a function)
kernel/module.c:852: error: initializer element is
I've found a couple of bugs so far...
1. I did `modprobe kvm' and then tried running a version of the KVM Qemu
compiled for a different kernel. My mistake. But I got an oops:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0008
printing eip:
f91f9c3f
*pde =
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:24:45 -0500
Thomas Tuttle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found a couple of bugs so far...
1. I did `modprobe kvm' and then tried running a version of the KVM Qemu
compiled for a different kernel. My mistake. But I got an oops:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:24:45 -0500
Thomas Tuttle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. I'm not sure if this bug is in the kernel, wireless tools, or the
ipw3945 driver, but I haven't changed the version of anything but the
kernel. When I do `iwconfig eth1 essid foobar' something drops the
last
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc6/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/
md-change-lifetime-rules-for-md-devices.patch gives me the following early
during boot (first WARNING() inside __mutex_lock_slowpath(), then BUG at
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 04:58:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:24:45 -0500
Thomas Tuttle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. I'm not sure if this bug is in the kernel, wireless tools, or the
ipw3945 driver, but I haven't changed the version of anything but the
kernel.
Michael Raskin wrote:
I have a strange problem with 2.6.19-rc-mm kernels. After I load X, I
notice that memory is marked used at rate of tens of KB/s. Then it
Tried 2.6.19-rc6-mm2. Now the problem is gone. Sometimes memory is
getting maked used as before, but when the loss reaches a few MB's
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:24:45 -0500
Thomas Tuttle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found a couple of bugs so far...
1. I did `modprobe kvm' and then tried running a version of the KVM Qemu
compiled for a different kernel. My mistake. But I got an oops:
BUG: unable to
100 matches
Mail list logo
