Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-03-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 23 February 2007 17:36, David Brownell wrote: > > > > > rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 > > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0030 > > > > > RIP: > > > > > [] rtc_sysfs_remove_device+0x23/0x50 > > The bug isn't in rtc_cmos,

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-03-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 23 February 2007 17:36, David Brownell wrote: rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0030 RIP: [804032c3] rtc_sysfs_remove_device+0x23/0x50 The bug isn't in rtc_cmos, but

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-28 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Andrew, On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:25:51 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:15:30 +0100 Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, all, > > > > I appear to need the following fix to be able to build 2.6.20-mm2 on > > x86_64. Without the fix, my build attempt dies

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-28 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Andrew, On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:25:51 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:15:30 +0100 Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andrew, all, I appear to need the following fix to be able to build 2.6.20-mm2 on x86_64. Without the fix, my build attempt dies on: In

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-27 Thread Andrew Morton
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:15:30 +0100 Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, all, > > I appear to need the following fix to be able to build 2.6.20-mm2 on > x86_64. Without the fix, my build attempt dies on: > > In file included from drivers/pci/quirks.c:532: >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-27 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:15:30 +0100 Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andrew, all, I appear to need the following fix to be able to build 2.6.20-mm2 on x86_64. Without the fix, my build attempt dies on: In file included from drivers/pci/quirks.c:532: include/asm/io_apic.h:61:

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-25 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Andrew, all, I appear to need the following fix to be able to build 2.6.20-mm2 on x86_64. Without the fix, my build attempt dies on: In file included from drivers/pci/quirks.c:532: include/asm/io_apic.h:61: error: "MAX_IO_APICS" undeclared here (not in a function) Not sure how nobody else

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-25 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Andrew, all, I appear to need the following fix to be able to build 2.6.20-mm2 on x86_64. Without the fix, my build attempt dies on: In file included from drivers/pci/quirks.c:532: include/asm/io_apic.h:61: error: MAX_IO_APICS undeclared here (not in a function) Not sure how nobody else was

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-23 Thread David Brownell
> > > > rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0030 > > > > RIP: > > > > [] rtc_sysfs_remove_device+0x23/0x50 The bug isn't in rtc_cmos, but that's the only driver that would currently show the bug.

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-23 Thread David Brownell
rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0030 RIP: [804032c3] rtc_sysfs_remove_device+0x23/0x50 The bug isn't in rtc_cmos, but that's the only driver that would currently show the bug.

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-22 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 22 February 2007 12:33 am, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Unfortunately, the userland shipped with OpenSUSE refuses to talk to the new > one (or I don't know how to make it do that). Did your "udev" create a /dev/rtc0? If not, /sys/class/rtc-dev/rtc0/dev will give the right major/minor

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 22 February 2007 04:57, David Brownell wrote: > On Tuesday 20 February 2007 2:07 pm, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Plus, I'd guess, the old rtc driver statically linked. > > > > Yes (mistakenly). > > Until someone merges the BSOD-for-Linux patch, I'll continue to > assume that

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 22 February 2007 04:57, David Brownell wrote: On Tuesday 20 February 2007 2:07 pm, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Plus, I'd guess, the old rtc driver statically linked. Yes (mistakenly). Until someone merges the BSOD-for-Linux patch, I'll continue to assume that oopsing is

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-22 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 22 February 2007 12:33 am, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Unfortunately, the userland shipped with OpenSUSE refuses to talk to the new one (or I don't know how to make it do that). Did your udev create a /dev/rtc0? If not, /sys/class/rtc-dev/rtc0/dev will give the right major/minor

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-21 Thread Oliver Pahl
Is this Problem still investigated? I got the same kernel bug a few minutes after booting my system with 2.6.20-mm2. As a student i am not yet as familiar with kernel programming as i want to be, but i will try, i promise. In the meantime, i always try to test the newest mm patches, and i have to

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-21 Thread David Brownell
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 2:07 pm, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Plus, I'd guess, the old rtc driver statically linked. > > Yes (mistakenly). Until someone merges the BSOD-for-Linux patch, I'll continue to assume that oopsing is the wrong response to "user" mistakes. ;) Legacy drivers can be

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-21 Thread David Brownell
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 2:07 pm, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Plus, I'd guess, the old rtc driver statically linked. Yes (mistakenly). Until someone merges the BSOD-for-Linux patch, I'll continue to assume that oopsing is the wrong response to user mistakes. ;) Legacy drivers can be such

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-21 Thread Oliver Pahl
Is this Problem still investigated? I got the same kernel bug a few minutes after booting my system with 2.6.20-mm2. As a student i am not yet as familiar with kernel programming as i want to be, but i will try, i promise. In the meantime, i always try to test the newest mm patches, and i have to

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: possible recursive locking detected (reiserfs-related)

2007-02-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 20.02.2007 22:23 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > Looks like reiserfs has some locking problems: > > = > [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] > 2.6.20-mm2 #6 > - > beagled/4786 is trying to acquire

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 20 February 2007 07:31, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:20:21 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]>

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 06:13, David Brownell wrote: > On Sunday 18 February 2007 4:28 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > One more thing: > > > > > > rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: FWIW, with CONFIG_PREEMPT unset (CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is set instead), I'm unable to reproduce this problem on the box on which it is readily reproducible with CONFIG_PREEMPT set. I'm not surprised... I routinely tell people to turn it off, when debugging a

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: possible recursive locking detected (reiserfs-related)

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Looks like reiserfs has some locking problems:

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 20 February 2007 01:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 19 February 2007 12:45, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > On 19/02/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:00, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 "Rafael

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Maciej Rutecki
Feb 20 12:18:35 maciek kernel: [ 1443.641949] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 003e Feb 20 12:18:35 maciek kernel: [ 1443.641974] printing eip: Feb 20 12:18:35 maciek kernel: [ 1443.641980] c01ede81 Feb 20 12:18:35 maciek kernel: [ 1443.641984] *pde =

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Maciej Rutecki
kernel BUG at block/ll_rw_blk.c:2782! invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT last sysfs file: /class/net/eth0/address Modules linked in: xt_tcpudp xt_limit xt_state iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nfnetlink iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables fuse ppdev lp thermal fan button processor

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Andrew Morton wrote: > - Judging by the number of times I get asked "is there a git tree for -mm", > nobody is reading the boilerplate. Here it is again: The git tree version of -mm seems to be sick. A fetch of the tag gives you something but it is "significantly" (200k lines of diff) away

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Andrew Morton wrote: - Judging by the number of times I get asked is there a git tree for -mm, nobody is reading the boilerplate. Here it is again: The git tree version of -mm seems to be sick. A fetch of the tag gives you something but it is significantly (200k lines of diff) away from

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Maciej Rutecki
kernel BUG at block/ll_rw_blk.c:2782! invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT last sysfs file: /class/net/eth0/address Modules linked in: xt_tcpudp xt_limit xt_state iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nfnetlink iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables fuse ppdev lp thermal fan button processor

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Maciej Rutecki
Feb 20 12:18:35 maciek kernel: [ 1443.641949] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 003e Feb 20 12:18:35 maciek kernel: [ 1443.641974] printing eip: Feb 20 12:18:35 maciek kernel: [ 1443.641980] c01ede81 Feb 20 12:18:35 maciek kernel: [ 1443.641984] *pde =

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: possible recursive locking detected (reiserfs-related)

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Looks like reiserfs has some locking problems:

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 06:13, David Brownell wrote: On Sunday 18 February 2007 4:28 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One more thing: rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 Unable to

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: possible recursive locking detected (reiserfs-related)

2007-02-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 20.02.2007 22:23 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: Looks like reiserfs has some locking problems: = [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.20-mm2 #6 - beagled/4786 is trying to acquire lock:

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 20 February 2007 01:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, 19 February 2007 12:45, Michal Piotrowski wrote: On 19/02/07, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:00, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: FWIW, with CONFIG_PREEMPT unset (CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is set instead), I'm unable to reproduce this problem on the box on which it is readily reproducible with CONFIG_PREEMPT set. I'm not surprised... I routinely tell people to turn it off, when debugging a

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 20 February 2007 07:31, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:20:21 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:20:21 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:00, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > netconsole is good. > > > > I know. :-) > > > > In the meantime, I've got something worse on another x86_64 box: > > > > Asus Laptop ACPI

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 12:45, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > On 19/02/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:00, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:28, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2 -- EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee

2007-02-19 Thread Jens Axboe
On Sun, Feb 18 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:35:17 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I guess I need to do a git-blockless -mm3 > > OK, this is looking like a pain - I'd have to drop or significantly redo > thirty or more patches. Jens, please fix it

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:08:03PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Michal Piotrowski napisał(a): > > Hi Frederik, > > > > On 20/02/07, Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Michal, > >> > >> This seems to be a locking problem in __make_request, check_plug_merge() > >> should be

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 02:34:53PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20 2007, Frederik Deweerdt wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:05:33PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > On 18/02/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Michal Piotrowski napisał(a): > Hi Frederik, > > On 20/02/07, Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Michal, >> >> This seems to be a locking problem in __make_request, check_plug_merge() >> should be called with the q->queue_lock held. >> Could you try the following patch? It

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi Frederik, On 20/02/07, Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Michal, This seems to be a locking problem in __make_request, check_plug_merge() should be called with the q->queue_lock held. Could you try the following patch? It silenced the oops for me. For me too, but Jens

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Jens Axboe
On Tue, Feb 20 2007, Frederik Deweerdt wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:05:33PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > On 18/02/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >wrote: > > > > > >> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at

[-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:05:33PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > On 18/02/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: > >> > Le 18.02.2007

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 19/02/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:00, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > netconsole is good. > > > > I know. :-) > > > > In the meantime, I've got something worse

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: compilation fix

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:29, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:33:26 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:00, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > netconsole is good. > > > > I know. :-) > > > > In the meantime, I've got something worse on another x86_64 box: > > > > Asus Laptop ACPI

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: compilation fix

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:29, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:33:26 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:00, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: netconsole is good. I know. :-) In the meantime, I've got something worse on another x86_64 box: Asus Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.30 L5D

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 19/02/07, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:00, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: netconsole is good. I know. :-) In the meantime, I've got something worse on another x86_64

[-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:05:33PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: On 18/02/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Jens Axboe
On Tue, Feb 20 2007, Frederik Deweerdt wrote: On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:05:33PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: On 18/02/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100,

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi Frederik, On 20/02/07, Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michal, This seems to be a locking problem in __make_request, check_plug_merge() should be called with the q-queue_lock held. Could you try the following patch? It silenced the oops for me. For me too, but Jens dislikes

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Michal Piotrowski napisał(a): Hi Frederik, On 20/02/07, Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michal, This seems to be a locking problem in __make_request, check_plug_merge() should be called with the q-queue_lock held. Could you try the following patch? It silenced the oops for

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 02:34:53PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: On Tue, Feb 20 2007, Frederik Deweerdt wrote: On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:05:33PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: On 18/02/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili [EMAIL

Re: [-mm patch] fix locking in __make_request (was Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request)

2007-02-19 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:08:03PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Michal Piotrowski napisał(a): Hi Frederik, On 20/02/07, Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michal, This seems to be a locking problem in __make_request, check_plug_merge() should be called with the

Re: 2.6.20-mm2 -- EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee

2007-02-19 Thread Jens Axboe
On Sun, Feb 18 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:35:17 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess I need to do a git-blockless -mm3 OK, this is looking like a pain - I'd have to drop or significantly redo thirty or more patches. Jens, please fix it asap. Will

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:28, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 12:45, Michal Piotrowski wrote: On 19/02/07, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:00, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: netconsole is good. I

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 19 February 2007 01:00, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: netconsole is good. I know. :-) In the meantime, I've got something worse on another x86_64 box: Asus Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.30 L5D

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-19 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:20:21 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote:

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 18 February 2007 4:28 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > One more thing: > > > > rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > > Will appear later at > > > > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: compilation fix

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:33:26 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > > Will appear later at > > > > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > netconsole is good. > > I know. :-) > > In the meantime, I've got something worse on another x86_64 box: > > Asus Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.30 > L5D model detected, supported > audit(1171831698.918:2):

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 19/02/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Temporarily at > > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: compilation fix

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ I think something like this is generally necessary:

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ One more thing: rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2 -- EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:35:17 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess I need to do a git-blockless -mm3 OK, this is looking like a pain - I'd have to drop or significantly redo thirty or more patches. Jens, please fix it asap. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: 2.6.20-mm2 -- EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:47:44 -0800 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like there are some slight differences between the stack traces I > have and the ones that have already been posted. > I hope this helps, > Miles > > psmouse.c: TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 18/02/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: > > Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a écrit : > > >Temporarily at > > > > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: > > Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a écrit : > > >Temporarily at > > > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > > > >Will appear

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > > Will appear later at > > > > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Andrew Morton napisał(a): > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > Slab corruption + oops yablb (yet another block layer bug) Slab corruption: start=f3b8f654, len=176 Redzone: 0x5a2cf071/0x5a2cf071. Last user: [](mempool_free_slab+0xe/0x10) 060: 6b 6b 6b 6b 00 00 6b

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-18 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: > Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a écrit : > >Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > > >Will appear later at > > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Two problems: 1) A showstopper with the root

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Two problems: 1) A showstopper with the root partition on

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-18 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a écrit : Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ Hello,

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Andrew Morton napisał(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Slab corruption + oops yablb (yet another block layer bug) Slab corruption: start=f3b8f654, len=176 Redzone: 0x5a2cf071/0x5a2cf071. Last user: [c0160f39](mempool_free_slab+0xe/0x10) 060: 6b 6b 6b 6b 00

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a écrit : Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: Oops in generic_make_request

2007-02-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 18/02/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0100 Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote: Le 18.02.2007 06:51, Andrew Morton a écrit : Temporarily at

Re: 2.6.20-mm2 -- EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:47:44 -0800 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like there are some slight differences between the stack traces I have and the ones that have already been posted. I hope this helps, Miles psmouse.c: TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost

Re: 2.6.20-mm2 -- EIP is at __make_request+0xeb/0x2ee

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:35:17 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess I need to do a git-blockless -mm3 OK, this is looking like a pain - I'd have to drop or significantly redo thirty or more patches. Jens, please fix it asap. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ One more thing: rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: compilation fix

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/ I think something like this is generally necessary: ---

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at

Re: 2.6.20-mm2: compilation fix

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:33:26 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later at

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/ Will appear later

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 19/02/07, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: netconsole is good. I know. :-) In the meantime, I've got something worse on another x86_64 box: Asus Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.30 L5D model detected, supported audit(1171831698.918:2): audit_pid=4281

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-18 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 18 February 2007 4:28 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:32:08 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One more thing: rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0030 RIP:

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:18:14 +1100 "Dave Airlie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - git-drm.patch is still in disgrace > > > > Okay I think I've fixed it up, some of the locking code from the DRM > git devel repo was completely integrated.. > yep, my X server is happy now. - To unsubscribe from

Re: 2.6.20-mm2

2007-02-17 Thread Dave Airlie
- git-drm.patch is still in disgrace Okay I think I've fixed it up, some of the locking code from the DRM git devel repo was completely integrated.. Dave. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo

  1   2   >