Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-30 Thread Håkan Lindqvist
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:30 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Subject: 2.6.21: sky2 "hw csum failure" problem > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/28/105 > > Submitter : Håkan Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Status : unknown > > > > This is not a "regression" it is a bug,

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-30 Thread Stephen Hemminger
> Subject: 2.6.21: sky2 "hw csum failure" problem > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/28/105 > Submitter : Håkan Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : unknown > This is not a "regression" it is a bug, that has shown up for some users for quite a while, see:

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-30 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Subject: 2.6.21: sky2 hw csum failure problem References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/28/105 Submitter : Håkan Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown This is not a regression it is a bug, that has shown up for some users for quite a while, see:

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-30 Thread Håkan Lindqvist
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:30 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Subject: 2.6.21: sky2 hw csum failure problem References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/28/105 Submitter : Håkan Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown This is not a regression it is a bug, that has shown up

Re: send_IPI_mask_bitmask() (Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team))

2007-04-29 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 01:34 -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > clockevents_notify() is called with the power verify information for an > > offline CPU. I can handle this in the clockevents code, but I think acpi > > is the correct place. > > So the CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y case is broken, > but the

Re: send_IPI_mask_bitmask() (Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team))

2007-04-29 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 01:34 -0400, Len Brown wrote: clockevents_notify() is called with the power verify information for an offline CPU. I can handle this in the clockevents code, but I think acpi is the correct place. So the CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y case is broken, but the

send_IPI_mask_bitmask() (Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team))

2007-04-28 Thread Len Brown
On Saturday 28 April 2007 12:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. > > Michal, thanks for stepping up ! > > > Subject: 2.6.21 - BUG: at

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 20:10 +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote: > Thomas Gleixner schrieb: > > On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > >> Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? > >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 > >> Submitter : Thomas

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Diego Calleja
El Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:03:07 +0200, Thomas Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Please remove this from the regression list. This seems to be an > userspace only problem and is not related to any kernel driver: > amarok and/or audacious seems to repeatedly read/write to the X socket: OK - I

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Thomas Meyer
Thomas Gleixner schrieb: > On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > >> Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 >> Submitter : Thomas Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Status : Unknow >> > > Michal, >

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Thomas Meyer
Michal Piotrowski schrieb: > Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 > Submitter : Thomas Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : Unknow > > Please remove this from the regression list. This seems to be an userspace only

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >Hi Gene, > >On 28/04/07, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >> >Hi all, >> > >> >Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. >> > >> >Feel free to add new

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi Gene, On 28/04/07, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >Hi all, > >Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. > >Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. >http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions > I

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 > Submitter : Thomas Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : Unknow Michal, I don't think this is a regression. What Thomas

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Michal, thanks for stepping up ! > Subject: 2.6.21 - BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/smp.c:177 > send_IPI_mask_bitmask() > References :

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >Hi all, > >Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. > >Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. >http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions > I went here, but without a login the page is immutable Therefore

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions I went here, but without a login the page is immutable Therefore I'll add

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Michal, thanks for stepping up ! Subject: 2.6.21 - BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/smp.c:177 send_IPI_mask_bitmask() References :

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 Submitter : Thomas Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : Unknow Michal, I don't think this is a regression. What Thomas wanted

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi Gene, On 28/04/07, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions I went

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi Gene, On 28/04/07, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Thomas Meyer
Michal Piotrowski schrieb: Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 Submitter : Thomas Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : Unknow Please remove this from the regression list. This seems to be an userspace only problem and

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Thomas Meyer
Thomas Gleixner schrieb: On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 Submitter : Thomas Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : Unknow Michal, I don't think

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Diego Calleja
El Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:03:07 +0200, Thomas Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Please remove this from the regression list. This seems to be an userspace only problem and is not related to any kernel driver: amarok and/or audacious seems to repeatedly read/write to the X socket: OK - I added it

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

2007-04-28 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 20:10 +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote: Thomas Gleixner schrieb: On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 Submitter : Thomas Meyer [EMAIL

send_IPI_mask_bitmask() (Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team))

2007-04-28 Thread Len Brown
On Saturday 28 April 2007 12:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Michal, thanks for stepping up ! Subject: 2.6.21 - BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/smp.c:177