On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:59:23AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:00:08AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
...
> > > How about cc:ing the netpoll maintainer?
> >
> > Is there a new one or do you suggest
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:59:23AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:00:08AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
...
How about cc:ing the netpoll maintainer?
Is there a new one or do you suggest possibility of
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:00:08AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > > > Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:26:12PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
...
> Whoops, I only said that in humour, probably should've snuck in a
> smiley or two. Definitely not blaming anybody. Apologies to anyone
> who felt offended, sorry, nothing such was intended, I assure.
I see you probably didn't
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:02:21PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> [...]
> How often "common" developer has to make such decisions in Kconfig?
> Probably no more than once per year. So, it's fair to blame anybody
> for not reading lkml to find if there
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:02:21PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > > endif # NETDEVICES
> > > >
> > > > config NETPOLL
> > > > depends on NETDEVICES
> > > > def_bool NETCONSOLE
> > > >
> > > > config
[ Read through the thread, looked at Kconfig files,
did some tests. Adding Kconfig experts to Cc: list. ]
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > > endif # NETDEVICES
> > > >
> > > > config NETPOLL
> > > > depends on NETDEVICES
> > > > def_bool
Hi,
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > endif # NETDEVICES
> > >
> > > config NETPOLL
> > > depends on NETDEVICES
> > > def_bool NETCONSOLE
> > >
> > > config NETPOLL_TRAP
> > > bool "Netpoll traffic trapping"
> > > default n
> > >
> >
> > ...
> > endif # NETDEVICES
> >
> > config NETPOLL
> > depends on NETDEVICES
> > def_bool NETCONSOLE
> >
> > config NETPOLL_TRAP
> > bool "Netpoll traffic trapping"
> > default n
> > depends on NETPOLL
> >
> > config NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> >
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > > Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > > >>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski
...
endif # NETDEVICES
config NETPOLL
depends on NETDEVICES
def_bool NETCONSOLE
config NETPOLL_TRAP
bool Netpoll traffic trapping
default n
depends on NETPOLL
config NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
def_bool NETPOLL
Hi,
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
...
endif # NETDEVICES
config NETPOLL
depends on NETDEVICES
def_bool NETCONSOLE
config NETPOLL_TRAP
bool Netpoll traffic trapping
default n
depends on NETPOLL
config
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:02:21PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
...
endif # NETDEVICES
config NETPOLL
depends on NETDEVICES
def_bool NETCONSOLE
config NETPOLL_TRAP
bool Netpoll
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:02:21PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
[...]
How often common developer has to make such decisions in Kconfig?
Probably no more than once per year. So, it's fair to blame anybody
for not reading lkml to find if there are
[ Read through the thread, looked at Kconfig files,
did some tests. Adding Kconfig experts to Cc: list. ]
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
...
endif # NETDEVICES
config NETPOLL
depends on NETDEVICES
def_bool NETCONSOLE
config
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:26:12PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
...
Whoops, I only said that in humour, probably should've snuck in a
smiley or two. Definitely not blaming anybody. Apologies to anyone
who felt offended, sorry, nothing such was intended, I assure.
I see you probably didn't
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:00:08AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue,
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > >> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > >>> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
> >
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/
Looks like -rc1-mm2 came out while I was hunting this, haven't tried that yet)
File-backed loopback seems to be broken (note that I use a LVM volume
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> >> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >>> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/
Looks like -rc1-mm2 came out while I was hunting this, haven't tried that yet)
File-backed loopback seems to be broken (note that I use a LVM volume
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 03:31:43 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:01:21 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said:
> > So, the BIOS is telling us that at least as currently configured, the
> > TPM can't use interrupts. /sys/devices/pnp0/00:0f/options should have
> > all the *possible* TPM
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:01:21 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said:
> So, the BIOS is telling us that at least as currently configured, the
> TPM can't use interrupts. /sys/devices/pnp0/00:0f/options should have
> all the *possible* TPM configurations. I would guess that none of them
> shows an IRQ either.
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 12:48:29 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Scratch that. When I wrote the first note, I was at home, and the TPM chip
> did its PNP thing and became 00:0e. I failed to notice that in my reply,
> I was at work, and the printer port on the docking station became 00:0e and
> the
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:53:19 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > Just for the record, I see this in /sys:
> > >
> > > % cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/id
> > > BCM0102
> > > PNP0c31
> >
> > What's in /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/resources?
>
> % cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/resources
> state =
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
>> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got this
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 06:44:52AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
...
> kgdboe is completely useless without a network card that has a polling
> driver. It seems to me that the simple and easy fix is to set it to
> depend on NETDEVICES but allow it to use select on NETPOLL.
Maybe I miss your point
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
> >> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> Hi,
>
> I got this compile error with a
Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I got this compile error with a randconfig (
>>> http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
...
net/core/netpoll.c: In function
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
...
Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 06:44:52AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
...
kgdboe is completely useless without a network card that has a polling
driver. It seems to me that the simple and easy fix is to set it to
depend on NETDEVICES but allow it to use select on NETPOLL.
Maybe I miss your point
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:53:19 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Just for the record, I see this in /sys:
% cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/id
BCM0102
PNP0c31
What's in /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/resources?
% cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/resources
state = active
io 0x378-0x37f
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 12:48:29 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scratch that. When I wrote the first note, I was at home, and the TPM chip
did its PNP thing and became 00:0e. I failed to notice that in my reply,
I was at work, and the printer port on the docking station became 00:0e and
the TPM
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:01:21 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said:
So, the BIOS is telling us that at least as currently configured, the
TPM can't use interrupts. /sys/devices/pnp0/00:0f/options should have
all the *possible* TPM configurations. I would guess that none of them
shows an IRQ either.
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 03:31:43 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:01:21 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said:
So, the BIOS is telling us that at least as currently configured, the
TPM can't use interrupts. /sys/devices/pnp0/00:0f/options should have
all the *possible* TPM
>On 7/30/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes
> > > unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:43:13 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said:
> I don't know why tpm_tis_init() is messing around trying different
> IRQs between 3 and 16. That looks suspiciously x86-dependent.
>
> Maybe if you don't have PNP (though I doubt TPMs exist on any
> pre-PNPBIOS machines) the "check-IRQ"
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes
> > unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We could cook up a `struct file' on the
> > stack (we do that in
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes
> unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We could cook up a `struct file' on the
> stack (we do that in various places), but that sucks.
>
> Christoph, have you any
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:58:34 +
"Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I get an oops when trying to mount an ISO file using the loopback device.
> > If I revert the patch 'loop-use-unlocked_ioctl.patch' the mount works.
> >
> > Here's the oops:
> >
> > [ 85.697033] Unable to
On Friday 27 July 2007 04:43:13 pm Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Friday 27 July 2007 07:28:09 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Looks like the problematic code is in tpm_tis.c tpm_tis_init() near here:
> >
> > for (i = 3; i < 16 && chip->vendor.irq == 0; i++) {
> >
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:07:22 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> next randconfig error (
>> http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-87.mm_sparse.error )
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> mm/sparse.c: In function 'sparse_init':
>> mm/sparse.c:482: error: implicit
> Hi,
> I get an oops when trying to mount an ISO file using the loopback device.
> If I revert the patch 'loop-use-unlocked_ioctl.patch' the mount works.
>
> Here's the oops:
>
> [ 85.697033] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> 0100 RIP:
> [ 85.702528] []
Hi,
I get an oops when trying to mount an ISO file using the loopback device.
If I revert the patch 'loop-use-unlocked_ioctl.patch' the mount works.
Here's the oops:
[ 85.697033] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0100 RIP:
[ 85.702528]
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:07:22 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
next randconfig error (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-87.mm_sparse.error )
...
mm/sparse.c: In function 'sparse_init':
mm/sparse.c:482: error: implicit declaration of function
On Friday 27 July 2007 04:43:13 pm Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Friday 27 July 2007 07:28:09 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like the problematic code is in tpm_tis.c tpm_tis_init() near here:
for (i = 3; i 16 chip-vendor.irq == 0; i++) {
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:58:34 +
Dave Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I get an oops when trying to mount an ISO file using the loopback device.
If I revert the patch 'loop-use-unlocked_ioctl.patch' the mount works.
Here's the oops:
[ 85.697033] Unable to handle kernel NULL
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes
unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We could cook up a `struct file' on the
stack (we do that in various places), but that sucks.
Christoph, have you any
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes
unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We could cook up a `struct file' on the
stack (we do that in various
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:43:13 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said:
I don't know why tpm_tis_init() is messing around trying different
IRQs between 3 and 16. That looks suspiciously x86-dependent.
Maybe if you don't have PNP (though I doubt TPMs exist on any
pre-PNPBIOS machines) the check-IRQ loop
On 7/30/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes
unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We could cook up a
On 7/28/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [] proc_cpuset_show+0x5e/0xb9
> > [] seq_read+0xef/0x266
> > [] vfs_read+0x8e/0x117
> > [] sys_read+0x3d/0x61
> > [] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
> > ===
> > INFO: lockdep is turned off.
> > Code: 00 89 d8 83 c4 0c
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/
>
Hi,
I get an oops when trying to mount an ISO file using the loopback device.
If I revert the patch
Berck E. Nash wrote:
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `acpi_pci_choose_state':
> pci-acpi.c:(.text+0xdccf): undefined reference to
> `acpi_pm_device_sleep_state'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `pnpacpi_suspend':
> core.c:(.text+0x35a7c): undefined reference to `acpi_pm_device_sleep_state'
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 -0700
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/
Hi,
I get an oops when trying to mount an ISO file using the loopback device.
If I revert the patch
Berck E. Nash wrote:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `acpi_pci_choose_state':
pci-acpi.c:(.text+0xdccf): undefined reference to
`acpi_pm_device_sleep_state'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `pnpacpi_suspend':
core.c:(.text+0x35a7c): undefined reference to `acpi_pm_device_sleep_state'
This
On 7/28/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[c0154ad2] proc_cpuset_show+0x5e/0xb9
[c01976b1] seq_read+0xef/0x266
[c0181398] vfs_read+0x8e/0x117
[c01817c9] sys_read+0x3d/0x61
[c010401e] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
===
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got this compile error with a randconfig (
>> http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
>>
>> ...
>>
>> net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll':
>>
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:07:22 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> next randconfig error (
> http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-87.mm_sparse.error )
>
>
> ...
>
> mm/sparse.c: In function 'sparse_init':
> mm/sparse.c:482: error: implicit declaration of function
>
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got this compile error with a randconfig (
> http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
>
> ...
>
> net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll':
> net/core/netpoll.c:155: error:
Hi,
next randconfig error (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-87.mm_sparse.error )
...
mm/sparse.c: In function 'sparse_init':
mm/sparse.c:482: error: implicit declaration of function
'sparse_early_usemap_alloc'
mm/sparse.c:482: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without
...
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.h:86: warning: 'snd_ac97_restore_status' declared
'static' but never defined
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.h:87: warning: 'snd_ac97_restore_iec958' declared
'static' but never defined
...
Got that with a randconfig ( http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-86.ioat
Hi,
I got this error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-86.ioat )
...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ioat_shutdown_functionality':
ioat.c:(.text+0x21ed32): undefined reference to `unregister_dca_provider'
ioat.c:(.text+0x21ed3a): undefined
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
...
net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll':
net/core/netpoll.c:155: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named
'poll_controller'
net/core/netpoll.c:159: error: 'struct
283
> [ 36.940581] Detected 12.500 MHz APIC timer.
>
> So I think, I will postpone SPARSEMEM until -mm2, as there are seem to
> be some problems in that area (Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 sparsemem_vmemamp
> fix)
>
> But maybee I will get SLUB to work. ;)
SLUB works, if I rebo
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:01:23 -0700 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking to see whether reading /proc files made things unhappy:
>
>find /proc/ | xargs cat
>find /proc/ -name "[g-z]*" | xargs cat
>find /proc/ -name "[a-g]*" | xargs file
>
> dmesg shows:
I'm
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 10:16:35PM -0700, Miles Lane wrote:
> MODPOST vmlinux.o
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x183): Section mismatch: reference to
> .init.text.1:start_kernel (between 'is386' and 'check_x87')
This one is not fixed - yet.
The rest are fixed in latest -linus.
modpost choked over
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 10:16:35PM -0700, Miles Lane wrote:
MODPOST vmlinux.o
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x183): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text.1:start_kernel (between 'is386' and 'check_x87')
This one is not fixed - yet.
The rest are fixed in latest -linus.
modpost choked over the
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:01:23 -0700 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking to see whether reading /proc files made things unhappy:
find /proc/ | xargs cat
find /proc/ -name [g-z]* | xargs cat
find /proc/ -name [a-g]* | xargs file
dmesg shows:
I'm unable to
timer.
So I think, I will postpone SPARSEMEM until -mm2, as there are seem to
be some problems in that area (Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 sparsemem_vmemamp
fix)
But maybee I will get SLUB to work. ;)
SLUB works, if I reboot (Alt+SysRq+B) from a 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 kernel.
Otherwise it will panic with IO-APIC
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
...
net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll':
net/core/netpoll.c:155: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named
'poll_controller'
net/core/netpoll.c:159: error: 'struct
Hi,
I got this error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-86.ioat )
...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ioat_shutdown_functionality':
ioat.c:(.text+0x21ed32): undefined reference to `unregister_dca_provider'
ioat.c:(.text+0x21ed3a): undefined
...
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.h:86: warning: 'snd_ac97_restore_status' declared
'static' but never defined
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.h:87: warning: 'snd_ac97_restore_iec958' declared
'static' but never defined
...
Got that with a randconfig ( http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-86.ioat
Hi,
next randconfig error (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-87.mm_sparse.error )
...
mm/sparse.c: In function 'sparse_init':
mm/sparse.c:482: error: implicit declaration of function
'sparse_early_usemap_alloc'
mm/sparse.c:482: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
...
net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll':
net/core/netpoll.c:155: error: 'struct
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:07:22 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
next randconfig error (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-87.mm_sparse.error )
...
mm/sparse.c: In function 'sparse_init':
mm/sparse.c:482: error: implicit declaration of function
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
...
net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll':
net/core/netpoll.c:155:
On Friday 27 July 2007 07:28:09 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Looks like the problematic code is in tpm_tis.c tpm_tis_init() near here:
>
> for (i = 3; i < 16 && chip->vendor.irq == 0; i++) {
> iowrite8(i, chip->vendor.iobase +
>
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:07:01 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:28:09 -0400
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > And we have a winner. In my bisect 'hunt' file, I ended at:
> >
> > fs-use-kmem_cache_zalloc-instead.patch GOOD
> > # remove-kconfig-setting-config_debug_shirq.patch: Ingo
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:28:09 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:32 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > Apparently, things go pear-shaped in tis_tpm_send(), when they get to the
> > 'if (chip->vendor.irq)' - under 22-rc6-mm1, we never got into this code,
> > because earlier
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:35 +0400, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> Sorry, guys, I am not happy with the modified LZO:
> the compressor tries to test bytes which are out of bounds.
>
> The attached module testlzo.c causes an oops in the second pass:
> AFAIK, both, @m and @m_pos should be in [wrkmem,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:32 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Apparently, things go pear-shaped in tis_tpm_send(), when they get to the
> 'if (chip->vendor.irq)' - under 22-rc6-mm1, we never got into this code,
> because earlier initialization complained it couldn't get IRQ8. Now, we
> get IRQ3,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
<-- snip -->
...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
lib/built-in.o: In function `lzo1x_1_compress':
(.text+0x13eae): multiple definition of `lzo1x_1_compress'
fs/built-in.o:(.text+0x117075): first defined here
make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
<-- snip -->
AFAIR, we once had a
Adrian Bunk wrote:
-- snip --
...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
lib/built-in.o: In function `lzo1x_1_compress':
(.text+0x13eae): multiple definition of `lzo1x_1_compress'
fs/built-in.o:(.text+0x117075): first defined here
make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
-- snip --
AFAIR, we once had a
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:32 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Apparently, things go pear-shaped in tis_tpm_send(), when they get to the
'if (chip-vendor.irq)' - under 22-rc6-mm1, we never got into this code,
because earlier initialization complained it couldn't get IRQ8. Now, we
get IRQ3, and
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:35 +0400, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Sorry, guys, I am not happy with the modified LZO:
the compressor tries to test bytes which are out of bounds.
The attached module testlzo.c causes an oops in the second pass:
AFAIK, both, @m and @m_pos should be in [wrkmem, wrkmem +
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:28:09 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:32 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Apparently, things go pear-shaped in tis_tpm_send(), when they get to the
'if (chip-vendor.irq)' - under 22-rc6-mm1, we never got into this code,
because earlier
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:07:01 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:28:09 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And we have a winner. In my bisect 'hunt' file, I ended at:
fs-use-kmem_cache_zalloc-instead.patch GOOD
# remove-kconfig-setting-config_debug_shirq.patch: Ingo worried
On Friday 27 July 2007 07:28:09 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like the problematic code is in tpm_tis.c tpm_tis_init() near here:
for (i = 3; i 16 chip-vendor.irq == 0; i++) {
iowrite8(i, chip-vendor.iobase +
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:37:37 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> I can't imagine what we did to break tpm_tis, sorry. Nothing has changed
> in there for ages.
>
> Perhaps something broke at the bus level. It would be useful to add
OK, so I made a more intrusive printk-all-over patch to track what it
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:07 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > > WARNING: Absolute relocations present
> > > Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym.Name
> > > c0202e73 00703601 R_386_32 c03071bc _sdata
> > >
> > > $ grep c03071bc System.map
> > > c03071bc R __tracedata_end
> > > c03071bc A
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
