On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Miles Lane wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 8:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Miles Lane wrote:
> > > On Dec 19, 2007 7:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thursday, 20 of
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Miles Lane wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 8:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Miles Lane wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 7:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph
On Dec 19, 2007 8:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Miles Lane wrote:
> > On Dec 19, 2007 7:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007,
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Miles Lane wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 7:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > > > We could reexport drain_local_pages()
On Dec 19, 2007 7:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > > We could reexport drain_local_pages() again but then I do not understand
> > > > why we would only
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > We could reexport drain_local_pages() again but then I do not understand
> > > why we would only drain the pages of this processor and not of all other
> > > processors as well. It
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > We could reexport drain_local_pages() again but then I do not understand
> > why we would only drain the pages of this processor and not of all other
> > processors as well. It seems that software suspend intend was to flush
> > them all right?
On Wednesday, 19 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> > > It looks like the swsusp_save() calls drain_all_pages() , which calls
> > > on_each_cpu() .. On return on_each_cpu() unconditionally enables
> > > interrupts so the rest of the resume
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > It looks like the swsusp_save() calls drain_all_pages() , which calls
> > on_each_cpu() .. On return on_each_cpu() unconditionally enables
> > interrupts so the rest of the resume process has interrupt enable
> > (which , it looks like, shouldn't
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 10:42 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 10:06 -0500, Miles Lane wrote:
> > [ 11.827653] PM: Creating hibernation image:
> > [ 11.827658] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp_32.c:561
> > native_smp_call_function_mask()
> > [ 11.827661] Pid: 9940, comm:
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 10:06 -0500, Miles Lane wrote:
> [ 11.827653] PM: Creating hibernation image:
> [ 11.827658] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp_32.c:561
> native_smp_call_function_mask()
> [ 11.827661] Pid: 9940, comm: pm-hibernate Not tainted
> 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 #8
> [ 11.827665] []
I discovered that I can use IMAP with GMail now, so I can send messages
using Thunderbird and avoid the line wrapping problem.
I tried doing a series: suspend-to-disk, suspend-to-ram and suspend-to-disk
Here is the result:
[ 11.827653] PM: Creating hibernation image:
[ 11.827658] WARNING:
I discovered that I can use IMAP with GMail now, so I can send messages
using Thunderbird and avoid the line wrapping problem.
I tried doing a series: suspend-to-disk, suspend-to-ram and suspend-to-disk
Here is the result:
[ 11.827653] PM: Creating hibernation image:
[ 11.827658] WARNING:
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 10:06 -0500, Miles Lane wrote:
[ 11.827653] PM: Creating hibernation image:
[ 11.827658] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp_32.c:561
native_smp_call_function_mask()
[ 11.827661] Pid: 9940, comm: pm-hibernate Not tainted
2.6.24-rc5-mm1 #8
[ 11.827665] [c0107d55]
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 10:42 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 10:06 -0500, Miles Lane wrote:
[ 11.827653] PM: Creating hibernation image:
[ 11.827658] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp_32.c:561
native_smp_call_function_mask()
[ 11.827661] Pid: 9940, comm: pm-hibernate
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Daniel Walker wrote:
It looks like the swsusp_save() calls drain_all_pages() , which calls
on_each_cpu() .. On return on_each_cpu() unconditionally enables
interrupts so the rest of the resume process has interrupt enable
(which , it looks like, shouldn't happen) and
On Wednesday, 19 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Daniel Walker wrote:
It looks like the swsusp_save() calls drain_all_pages() , which calls
on_each_cpu() .. On return on_each_cpu() unconditionally enables
interrupts so the rest of the resume process has
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
We could reexport drain_local_pages() again but then I do not understand
why we would only drain the pages of this processor and not of all other
processors as well. It seems that software suspend intend was to flush
them all right?
Well,
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
We could reexport drain_local_pages() again but then I do not understand
why we would only drain the pages of this processor and not of all other
processors as well. It seems that
On Dec 19, 2007 7:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
We could reexport drain_local_pages() again but then I do not understand
why we would only drain the pages of
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Miles Lane wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 7:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
We could reexport drain_local_pages() again but then I do
On Dec 19, 2007 8:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Miles Lane wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 7:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki
22 matches
Mail list logo
