On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, David Ford wrote:
> James Sutherland wrote:
>
> > No. I am assuming you are installing the kernel on the machine you do
> > "make modules_install" on. Obviously it is possible to install a different
> > kernel image of the same version without updating the modules - but if
James Sutherland wrote:
> No. I am assuming you are installing the kernel on the machine you do
> "make modules_install" on. Obviously it is possible to install a different
> kernel image of the same version without updating the modules - but if you
> do so, expect nasty things to happen anyway
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Butter, Frank wrote:
> > How about putting these files in the modules directory? That
> > way, we have
> > a nice consistent location for them.
> > /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/System.map etc. is a fair
> > approximation, but
> > you lose that every time the kernel
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Butter, Frank wrote:
How about putting these files in the modules directory? That
way, we have
a nice consistent location for them.
/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/System.map etc. is a fair
approximation, but
you lose that every time the kernel source is
James Sutherland wrote:
No. I am assuming you are installing the kernel on the machine you do
"make modules_install" on. Obviously it is possible to install a different
kernel image of the same version without updating the modules - but if you
do so, expect nasty things to happen anyway if
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, David Ford wrote:
James Sutherland wrote:
No. I am assuming you are installing the kernel on the machine you do
"make modules_install" on. Obviously it is possible to install a different
kernel image of the same version without updating the modules - but if you
do
6 matches
Mail list logo
