Re: Awful long timeouts for flash-file-system

2005-03-17 Thread Voluspa
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:06:23 +0100 Voluspa wrote: Went back to 2.6.10 and just got one of those dma_timer_expiry freezes. Seems the disk is on the blink then. Sorry about the noise. Mvh Mats Johannesson -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

Re: Awful long timeouts for flash-file-system

2005-03-17 Thread Voluspa
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:06:23 +0100 Voluspa wrote: some junk Went back to 2.6.10 and just got one of those dma_timer_expiry freezes. Seems the disk is on the blink then. Sorry about the noise. Mvh Mats Johannesson -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the

Re: Awful long timeouts for flash-file-system

2005-03-16 Thread Voluspa
At 2005-03-15 0:28:59 linux-os wrote: > But when it is on a system that is booting from a real drive, I get > the following errors, each one taking 15 seconds to time-out. I'm getting these freezes (timeouts) sporadicly on a normal IDE system during normal runtime. Ext2 file system, no pattern

Re: Awful long timeouts for flash-file-system

2005-03-16 Thread Voluspa
At 2005-03-15 0:28:59 linux-os wrote: But when it is on a system that is booting from a real drive, I get the following errors, each one taking 15 seconds to time-out. I'm getting these freezes (timeouts) sporadicly on a normal IDE system during normal runtime. Ext2 file system, no pattern

Re: Awful long timeouts for flash-file-system

2005-03-14 Thread Robert Hancock
linux-os wrote: Hello IDE experts. I am trying to use a SanDisk SDCFB-256, CFA DISK drive. This is supposed to emulate an IDE drive and does (sort of). However, upon boot, the boot-code keeps trying and trying and trying to do SOMETHING that aparently isn't even necessary because the virtual disk

Re: Awful long timeouts for flash-file-system

2005-03-14 Thread Robert Hancock
linux-os wrote: Hello IDE experts. I am trying to use a SanDisk SDCFB-256, CFA DISK drive. This is supposed to emulate an IDE drive and does (sort of). However, upon boot, the boot-code keeps trying and trying and trying to do SOMETHING that aparently isn't even necessary because the virtual disk