Re: BLK_DEV_MD with CONFIG_NET

2007-03-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:30:24PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 21 March 2007 13:02:46 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > Anything which is every exported to modules, which ought to > > > be the situation in this case, should be obj-y not lib-y > > > right? > > > > That is also my

Re: BLK_DEV_MD with CONFIG_NET

2007-03-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:30:24PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Wednesday 21 March 2007 13:02:46 Sam Ravnborg wrote: Anything which is every exported to modules, which ought to be the situation in this case, should be obj-y not lib-y right? That is also my understanding of lib-y -

Re: BLK_DEV_MD with CONFIG_NET

2007-03-21 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:02:46 +0100 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 08:26:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:05:38 -0700 > > > > > Build a kernel with CONFIG_NET-n and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD=m. > > > Unless

Re: BLK_DEV_MD with CONFIG_NET

2007-03-21 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 13:02:46 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Anything which is every exported to modules, which ought to > > be the situation in this case, should be obj-y not lib-y > > right? > > That is also my understanding of lib-y - I should update makefiles.txt > to reflect this.. Strictly

Re: BLK_DEV_MD with CONFIG_NET

2007-03-21 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 08:26:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:05:38 -0700 > > > Build a kernel with CONFIG_NET-n and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD=m. > > Unless csum_partial() is built and kept by some arch Makefile, > > the result is: > >

Re: BLK_DEV_MD with CONFIG_NET

2007-03-21 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 08:26:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:05:38 -0700 Build a kernel with CONFIG_NET-n and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD=m. Unless csum_partial() is built and kept by some arch Makefile, the result is: ERROR:

Re: BLK_DEV_MD with CONFIG_NET

2007-03-21 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 13:02:46 Sam Ravnborg wrote: Anything which is every exported to modules, which ought to be the situation in this case, should be obj-y not lib-y right? That is also my understanding of lib-y - I should update makefiles.txt to reflect this.. Strictly speaking,

Re: BLK_DEV_MD with CONFIG_NET

2007-03-21 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:02:46 +0100 Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 08:26:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:05:38 -0700 Build a kernel with CONFIG_NET-n and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD=m. Unless csum_partial() is built

Re: BLK_DEV_MD with CONFIG_NET

2007-03-20 Thread David Miller
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:05:38 -0700 > Build a kernel with CONFIG_NET-n and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD=m. > Unless csum_partial() is built and kept by some arch Makefile, > the result is: > ERROR: "csum_partial" [drivers/md/md-mod.ko] undefined! > make[1]: ***

Re: BLK_DEV_MD with CONFIG_NET

2007-03-20 Thread David Miller
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:05:38 -0700 Build a kernel with CONFIG_NET-n and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD=m. Unless csum_partial() is built and kept by some arch Makefile, the result is: ERROR: csum_partial [drivers/md/md-mod.ko] undefined! make[1]: *** [__modpost]