On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:04:36 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 02:48:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:23:41 +1100
> > David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > How are you supposed to invalidate a range of pages in a mapping for
> > >
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:04:36 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 02:48:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:23:41 +1100
David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How are you supposed to invalidate a range of pages in a mapping for
this case, then?
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 02:48:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:23:41 +1100
> David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How are you supposed to invalidate a range of pages in a mapping for
> > this case, then? invalidate_mapping_pages() would appear to be the
> >
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:23:41 +1100
David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How are you supposed to invalidate a range of pages in a mapping for
> this case, then? invalidate_mapping_pages() would appear to be the
> candidate (the generic code uses this), but it _skips_ pages that
> are already
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 09:11:07PM +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Sami Farin wrote:
>
> > Linux 2.6.19.1 SMP [2] on Pentium D...
> > I was running dt-15.14 [2] and I ran
> > "cinfo datafile" (it does mincore()).
> > Well it went OK but when I ran "strace cinfo datafile"...:
> >
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 09:11:07PM +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Sami Farin wrote:
Linux 2.6.19.1 SMP [2] on Pentium D...
I was running dt-15.14 [2] and I ran
cinfo datafile (it does mincore()).
Well it went OK but when I ran strace cinfo datafile...:
04:18:48.062466
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:23:41 +1100
David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How are you supposed to invalidate a range of pages in a mapping for
this case, then? invalidate_mapping_pages() would appear to be the
candidate (the generic code uses this), but it _skips_ pages that
are already
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 02:48:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:23:41 +1100
David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How are you supposed to invalidate a range of pages in a mapping for
this case, then? invalidate_mapping_pages() would appear to be the
candidate (the
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 21:11:07 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Sami Farin wrote:
>
> > Linux 2.6.19.1 SMP [2] on Pentium D...
> > I was running dt-15.14 [2] and I ran
> > "cinfo datafile" (it does mincore()).
> > Well it went OK but when I ran "strace cinfo datafile"...:
> >
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Sami Farin wrote:
> Linux 2.6.19.1 SMP [2] on Pentium D...
> I was running dt-15.14 [2] and I ran
> "cinfo datafile" (it does mincore()).
> Well it went OK but when I ran "strace cinfo datafile"...:
> 04:18:48.062466 mincore(0x37f1f000, 2147266560,
You rightly noted in a
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Sami Farin wrote:
Linux 2.6.19.1 SMP [2] on Pentium D...
I was running dt-15.14 [2] and I ran
cinfo datafile (it does mincore()).
Well it went OK but when I ran strace cinfo datafile...:
04:18:48.062466 mincore(0x37f1f000, 2147266560,
You rightly noted in a followup
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 21:11:07 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Sami Farin wrote:
Linux 2.6.19.1 SMP [2] on Pentium D...
I was running dt-15.14 [2] and I ran
cinfo datafile (it does mincore()).
Well it went OK but when I ran strace cinfo datafile...:
04:18:48.062466
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 04:39:07 +0200, Sami Farin wrote:
> Linux 2.6.19.1 SMP [2] on Pentium D...
> I was running dt-15.14 [2] and I ran
> "cinfo datafile" (it does mincore()).
> Well it went OK but when I ran "strace cinfo datafile"...:
> 04:18:48.062466 mincore(0x37f1f000, 2147266560,
Forgot
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 04:39:07 +0200, Sami Farin wrote:
Linux 2.6.19.1 SMP [2] on Pentium D...
I was running dt-15.14 [2] and I ran
cinfo datafile (it does mincore()).
Well it went OK but when I ran strace cinfo datafile...:
04:18:48.062466 mincore(0x37f1f000, 2147266560,
Forgot to do
14 matches
Mail list logo