On Sunday 21 October 2007 18:55, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 17:16 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > if (writtenlen) {
> > - if (inode->i_size < (pg->index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) +
> > start + writtenlen) { - inode->i_size = (pg->index
> > <<
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 17:16 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> if (writtenlen) {
> - if (inode->i_size < (pg->index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) + start +
> writtenlen) {
> - inode->i_size = (pg->index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) +
> start + writtenlen;
> +
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 13:38 -0400, Erez Zadok wrote:
> Nick, the patch worked. All of my unionfs-over-jffs2 tests passed.
Can I have a Signed-off-by: for it please?
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nick Piggin writes:
[...]
> Hmm, looks like jffs2_write_end is writing more than we actually ask it
> to, and returns that back.
>
> unsigned aligned_start = start & ~3;
>
> and
>
> if (end == PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) {
> /* When writing ou
On Friday 19 October 2007 17:03, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Friday 19 October 2007 16:05, Erez Zadok wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > I'm testing unionfs on top of jffs2, using 2.6.24 as of linus's commit
> > 4fa4d23fa20de67df919030c1216295664866ad7. All of my unionfs tests pass
> > when unionfs is stacked
On Friday 19 October 2007 16:05, Erez Zadok wrote:
> David,
>
> I'm testing unionfs on top of jffs2, using 2.6.24 as of linus's commit
> 4fa4d23fa20de67df919030c1216295664866ad7. All of my unionfs tests pass
> when unionfs is stacked on top of jffs2, other than my truncate test --
> whic tries to
6 matches
Mail list logo
