> IMO that's the case of POSIX being misapplied. Rationale:
> * historically, ...
Yes, I know all about that.
Nevertheless the facts are here:
EPERM The system does not allow unlinking of directories,
or unlinking of directories requires privileges
that t
On Thu, 17 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Someone complained a moment ago about the error return in unlink.
> And indeed, it used to be correct but since 2.1.132 we return a
> buggy (or at least non-POSIX) error for unlink(directory).
> [The EISDIR is correct for rename(), and the cleanu
>EISDIR pathname refers to a directory. (This is the non-
> POSIX value returned by Linux since 2.1.132.)
it isnnt that simple -ac does the right thing now I believe
> Probably this should be fixed again, both in 2.2 and 2.4.
> 2.0 is still correct (I checked only ext2).
3 matches
Mail list logo
