Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9

2020-10-12 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:22 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > JFYI, when comparing v5.9[1] to v5.9-rc8[3], the summaries are: > - build errors: +6/-3 > - build warnings: +5/-0 + error: modpost: "devm_ioremap" [drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac.ko] undefined!: => N/A + error: modpost: "d

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

2020-10-07 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 02:48:42PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 04:02:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 02:45:30PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > Richard Weinberger schreef op wo 07-10-2020 om 14:08 [+0200]: > > > > UML has no ia32 emulation

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

2020-10-07 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 04:02:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 02:45:30PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Richard Weinberger schreef op wo 07-10-2020 om 14:08 [+0200]: > > > UML has no ia32 emulation and therefore no in_ia32_syscall(). > > > Maybe you can check for CONFIG_I

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

2020-10-07 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 02:45:30PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > Richard Weinberger schreef op wo 07-10-2020 om 14:08 [+0200]: > > UML has no ia32 emulation and therefore no in_ia32_syscall(). > > Maybe you can check for CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION too? > > The pending fix is: > #if defined(CONFIG_X86_

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

2020-10-07 Thread Richard Weinberger
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:47 PM Paul Bolle wrote: > > Richard Weinberger schreef op wo 07-10-2020 om 14:08 [+0200]: > > UML has no ia32 emulation and therefore no in_ia32_syscall(). > > Maybe you can check for CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION too? > > The pending fix is: > #if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && !d

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

2020-10-07 Thread Paul Bolle
Richard Weinberger schreef op wo 07-10-2020 om 14:08 [+0200]: > UML has no ia32 emulation and therefore no in_ia32_syscall(). > Maybe you can check for CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION too? The pending fix is: #if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && !defined(CONFIG_UML) Since this check guards in_ia32_syscall() j

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

2020-10-07 Thread Richard Weinberger
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 1:51 PM Paul Bolle wrote: > > [Added Richard and Anton.] > > Andy Shevchenko schreef op ma 05-10-2020 om 15:58 [+0300]: > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:35:33AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:33 AM Geert Uytterhoeven > > > wrote: > > > > JFY

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

2020-10-07 Thread Paul Bolle
Andy Shevchenko schreef op wo 07-10-2020 om 14:58 [+0300]: > Does [1] fix the issue? > > [1]: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20201005131044.87276-1-andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com/ Yes, it fixes the build error. Thanks, Paul Bolle

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

2020-10-07 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:50 PM Paul Bolle wrote: > Andy Shevchenko schreef op ma 05-10-2020 om 15:58 [+0300]: > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:35:33AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:33 AM Geert Uytterhoeven > > > wrote: > > > > JFYI, when comparing v5.9-rc8[1] to

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

2020-10-07 Thread Paul Bolle
[Added Richard and Anton.] Andy Shevchenko schreef op ma 05-10-2020 om 15:58 [+0300]: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:35:33AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:33 AM Geert Uytterhoeven > > wrote: > > > JFYI, when comparing v5.9-rc8[1] to v5.9-rc7[3], the summaries are:

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

2020-10-05 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:35:33AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:33 AM Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: > > JFYI, when comparing v5.9-rc8[1] to v5.9-rc7[3], the summaries are: > > - build errors: +3/-6 Thanks for the report! > + /kisskb/src/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cde

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

2020-10-05 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:33 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > JFYI, when comparing v5.9-rc8[1] to v5.9-rc7[3], the summaries are: > - build errors: +3/-6 + /kisskb/src/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_ia32_syscall' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]:

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc7

2020-09-28 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:59 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > JFYI, when comparing v5.9-rc7[1] to v5.9-rc6[3], the summaries are: > - build errors: +5/-3 + error: modpost: "fw_arg3" [drivers/mtd/parsers/bcm63xxpart.ko] undefined!: => N/A mips-allmodconfig (It's back, first seen in v5.9-rc1)

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc6

2020-09-21 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:32 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > JFYI, when comparing v5.9-rc6[1] to v5.9-rc5[3], the summaries are: > - build errors: +3/-5 + /kisskb/src/drivers/dax/super.c: error: redefinition of 'dax_supported': => 325:6 m68k-defconfig sun3_defconfig mips-allmodconfig sparc-

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc2

2020-08-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:23 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > JFYI, when comparing v5.9-rc2[1] to v5.9-rc1[3], the summaries are: > - build errors: +12/-0 + /kisskb/src/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'disable_kernel_vsx' [-We

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc1

2020-08-17 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 3:18 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in > v5.9-rc1[1] compared to v5.8[2]. > > Summarized: > - build errors: +1/-12 > - build warnings: +68/-124 > > Happy fixing! ;-) > > Thanks to the linux-next team for