According to Matthias Andree:
> I have a vanilla 2.2.18 that I patch Andrea Arcangeli's VM-global-7
> patch (for 2.2.18pre25) on top, as well as I²C 2.5.4, the current
> --12-09 IDE.2.2.18 patch and ReiserFS 3.5.28. So far, so good. If I now
> patch serial 5.05 on top of that, the kernel itself
According to Matthias Andree:
I have a vanilla 2.2.18 that I patch Andrea Arcangeli's VM-global-7
patch (for 2.2.18pre25) on top, as well as I²C 2.5.4, the current
--12-09 IDE.2.2.18 patch and ReiserFS 3.5.28. So far, so good. If I now
patch serial 5.05 on top of that, the kernel itself
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
> What file does step 3 modify? It's likely this patch is being overwritten
> (lost) in step 4. Probably not the source of the problem though.
No, it's not being overwritten, but it's most likely not the source of
the problem.
Permissions have been
From: "Matthias Andree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 3. patch the kernel with that 2.2.18-fix-serial-5.05-pre.patch, it takes
>a high fuzz factor (try patch -p1 -F10)
> 4. unpack serial-5.05
I don't have permission to fetch
2.2.18-fix-serial-5.05-pre.patch
at
Andrea Arcangeli schrieb am Freitag, den 22. Dezember 2000:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > I suspect that these patches are mutually incompatible.
>
> did you checked that there are no rejects after patching :)
Yes, I did, there were none.
I had one
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> I suspect that these patches are mutually incompatible.
did you checked that there are no rejects after patching :)
> Could somebody please have a look at this? I will test or provide more
> information as requested.
Where's
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
I suspect that these patches are mutually incompatible.
did you checked that there are no rejects after patching :)
Could somebody please have a look at this? I will test or provide more
information as requested.
Where's
Andrea Arcangeli schrieb am Freitag, den 22. Dezember 2000:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
I suspect that these patches are mutually incompatible.
did you checked that there are no rejects after patching :)
Yes, I did, there were none.
I had one patch
From: "Matthias Andree" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3. patch the kernel with that 2.2.18-fix-serial-5.05-pre.patch, it takes
a high fuzz factor (try patch -p1 -F10)
4. unpack serial-5.05
I don't have permission to fetch
2.2.18-fix-serial-5.05-pre.patch
at
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
What file does step 3 modify? It's likely this patch is being overwritten
(lost) in step 4. Probably not the source of the problem though.
No, it's not being overwritten, but it's most likely not the source of
the problem.
Permissions have been
10 matches
Mail list logo
