Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-27 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> > >> > * Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> > >> >> > * Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> > >> >>

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-27 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-20 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> > > >> > * Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi Ingo and Thomas- > >> >> > >> >> There's a trivial conflict

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-20 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > >> Hi Ingo and Thomas- > >> > >> There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week. > > > > This is your x86 entry code rework pull request, right? The -tip > >

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-20 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> > >> > * Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Ingo and Thomas- >> >> >> >> There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week. >> > >> >

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-20 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> * Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >>> Hi Ingo and Thomas- >>> >>> There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week. >> >> This is your x86 entry code rework pull request,

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-20 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> Hi Ingo and Thomas- >> >> There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week. > > This is your x86 entry code rework pull request, right? The -tip > tree now has the RCU commit it depends on, so

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-20 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Hi Ingo and Thomas- > > There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week. This is your x86 entry code rework pull request, right? The -tip tree now has the RCU commit it depends on, so could you please rebase it on top of tip:core/rcu so I can pull

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-20 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Hi Ingo and Thomas- There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week. This is your x86 entry code rework pull request, right? The -tip tree now has the RCU commit it depends on, so could you please rebase it on top of

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-20 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Hi Ingo and Thomas- There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week. This is your

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-20 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Hi

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-20 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Hi Ingo and Thomas- There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week. This is your x86 entry code rework

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-20 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Hi Ingo and Thomas- There's a trivial conflict in the

Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

2015-01-20 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Hi Ingo and Thomas- There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week. This is your x86 entry code rework pull request, right? The -tip tree now has the RCU