On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >
>> > * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> >> >
>> >>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar
* Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> >
> >> > * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Ingo and Thomas-
> >> >>
> >> >> There's a trivial conflict
* Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ingo and Thomas-
> >>
> >> There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week.
> >
> > This is your x86 entry code rework pull request, right? The -tip
> >
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >
>> > * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Ingo and Thomas-
>> >>
>> >> There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week.
>> >
>> >
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ingo and Thomas-
>>>
>>> There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week.
>>
>> This is your x86 entry code rework pull request,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> Hi Ingo and Thomas-
>>
>> There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week.
>
> This is your x86 entry code rework pull request, right? The -tip
> tree now has the RCU commit it depends on, so
* Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi Ingo and Thomas-
>
> There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week.
This is your x86 entry code rework pull request, right? The -tip
tree now has the RCU commit it depends on, so could you please
rebase it on top of tip:core/rcu so I can pull
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
Hi Ingo and Thomas-
There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week.
This is your x86 entry code rework pull request, right? The -tip
tree now has the RCU commit it depends on, so could you please
rebase it on top of
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
Hi Ingo and Thomas-
There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week.
This is your
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
Hi
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
Hi Ingo and Thomas-
There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week.
This is your x86 entry code rework
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
Hi Ingo and Thomas-
There's a trivial conflict in the
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
Hi Ingo and Thomas-
There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week.
This is your x86 entry code rework pull request, right? The -tip
tree now has the RCU
14 matches
Mail list logo