Re: Heads up on 2.6.12-rc1 and later

2005-04-14 Thread K.R. Foley
Tom Duffy wrote: On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 12:29 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In testing with 2.6.12-rc1 and -rc2, we've been encountering an issue on SMP machines with the loading of scsi_mod and sd_mod modules. The sd_mod load fails with unresolved symbols. It appears to be a race condition based

Re: Heads up on 2.6.12-rc1 and later

2005-04-14 Thread Tom Duffy
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 12:29 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In testing with 2.6.12-rc1 and -rc2, we've been encountering an issue > on SMP machines with the loading of scsi_mod and sd_mod modules. The > sd_mod load fails with unresolved symbols. It appears to be a race > condition based on how

Re: Heads up on 2.6.12-rc1 and later

2005-04-14 Thread Tom Duffy
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 12:29 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In testing with 2.6.12-rc1 and -rc2, we've been encountering an issue on SMP machines with the loading of scsi_mod and sd_mod modules. The sd_mod load fails with unresolved symbols. It appears to be a race condition based on how

Re: Heads up on 2.6.12-rc1 and later

2005-04-14 Thread K.R. Foley
Tom Duffy wrote: On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 12:29 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In testing with 2.6.12-rc1 and -rc2, we've been encountering an issue on SMP machines with the loading of scsi_mod and sd_mod modules. The sd_mod load fails with unresolved symbols. It appears to be a race condition based