Re: Is this a bug in linux-2.6.12 ipsec code function xfrm4_rcv_encap ??

k8 s wrote: I AM SORRY FOR THE PREVIOUS MAIL. I am correcting my previous mail. Infact I see only One race(not three as was wrongly pointed out). I commented out the section once again where the race might be. / Race Here . The

Re: Is this a bug in linux-2.6.12 ipsec code function xfrm4_rcv_encap ??

I AM SORRY FOR THE PREVIOUS MAIL. I am correcting my previous mail. Infact I see only One race(not three as was wrongly pointed out). I commented out the section once again where the race might be. On 7/23/05, k8 s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I see a possible race in linux-2.6.12

Re: Is this a bug in linux-2.6.12 ipsec code function xfrm4_rcv_encap ??

I AM SORRY FOR THE PREVIOUS MAIL. I am correcting my previous mail. Infact I see only One race(not three as was wrongly pointed out). I commented out the section once again where the race might be. On 7/23/05, k8 s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I see a possible race in linux-2.6.12 ipsec

Re: Is this a bug in linux-2.6.12 ipsec code function xfrm4_rcv_encap ??

k8 s wrote: I AM SORRY FOR THE PREVIOUS MAIL. I am correcting my previous mail. Infact I see only One race(not three as was wrongly pointed out). I commented out the section once again where the race might be. / Race Here . The