Re: Problematic culture around Signed-off-by

2017-07-31 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2017-07-31 16:44:49, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:34:11PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 08:52:36PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > I've been away from kernel development for a bit, but I've returned and > > > > I'm troubled by what

Re: Problematic culture around Signed-off-by

2017-07-31 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2017-07-31 16:44:49, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:34:11PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 08:52:36PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > I've been away from kernel development for a bit, but I've returned and > > > > I'm troubled by what

Re: Problematic culture around Signed-off-by

2017-07-31 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:34:11PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 08:52:36PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I've been away from kernel development for a bit, but I've returned and > > > I'm troubled by what seems to be an entrenched and widespread (IMO) > > > misuse of the

Re: Problematic culture around Signed-off-by

2017-07-31 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:34:11PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 08:52:36PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I've been away from kernel development for a bit, but I've returned and > > > I'm troubled by what seems to be an entrenched and widespread (IMO) > > > misuse of the

Re: Problematic culture around Signed-off-by

2017-07-31 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 08:52:36PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > I've been away from kernel development for a bit, but I've returned and > > I'm troubled by what seems to be an entrenched and widespread (IMO) > > misuse of the "Signed-off-by:" in commits. > > > > I've now either been asked to

Re: Problematic culture around Signed-off-by

2017-07-31 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 08:52:36PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > I've been away from kernel development for a bit, but I've returned and > > I'm troubled by what seems to be an entrenched and widespread (IMO) > > misuse of the "Signed-off-by:" in commits. > > > > I've now either been asked to

Re: Problematic culture around Signed-off-by

2017-07-30 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > I've been away from kernel development for a bit, but I've returned and > I'm troubled by what seems to be an entrenched and widespread (IMO) > misuse of the "Signed-off-by:" in commits. > > I've now either been asked to sign off RFC quality patches "because its > quicker" on more than one

Re: Problematic culture around Signed-off-by

2017-07-30 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > I've been away from kernel development for a bit, but I've returned and > I'm troubled by what seems to be an entrenched and widespread (IMO) > misuse of the "Signed-off-by:" in commits. > > I've now either been asked to sign off RFC quality patches "because its > quicker" on more than one