On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:13:39PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > I tried this today, applied my patch
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > I tried this today, applied my patch for BE<->LE conversions and
> > glibc-2.2 compatibility (attached,
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your
> > HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your
> > HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your
> HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the new directory. The easiest
> thing is to cp -r
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:25:04AM CEST, I got a letter
> where David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > In other words, that index file simply _cannot_ be shared. Don't even
> > think about it. Only madness will ensue.
>
> If I use git in my home directory I cannot _help_ but share it.
> Sometimes I'm using it from a BE box, sometimes from a LE
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > I've already noticed GNU interactive tools (googling for git), but
> > it's Linus' choice of name. Alternative suggestions welcomed. What
> > about 'gt'? ;-)
>
> 'gt' or 'gi' both sound fine - 'gi' being a bit faster to type ;-).
> (Even
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 07:38 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> David, we already can. The objects are _designed_ to be shared.
>
> However, that is the ".git/objects" subdirectory. Not the per-view stuff.
> For each _view_ you do need to have view-specific data, and the view index
> very much is
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> I'd even like to see support for using multiple branches checked out of
> the same .git/ repository.
David, we already can. The objects are _designed_ to be shared.
However, that is the ".git/objects" subdirectory. Not the per-view stuff.
For
Le mercredi 13 avril 2005 Ã 10:25 +0100, David Woodhouse a Ãcrit :
> On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
> > in fully git environment.
>
> Maybe -- if we are prepared to propagate the BK myth that network
* Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh, and the other thing is:
> >
> > $ git pull
> >
> > GNU Interactive Tools 4.3.20 (armv4l-rmk-linux-gnu), 20:02:38 Mar 7 2001
> > GIT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
> > terms of the GNU General Public License
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:46:19AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> I'll bet at the top of this you have a mktemp error.
Indeed, thanks.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 11:42 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> It's fine to share the objects database. If you want to share the
> directory cache, you are doing something wrong, though. What do you
> need it for?
I want to _not_ care which machine I happen to be on when I use git
repositories which
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:38:52AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:35:21AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
> > Linus' git, aimed at human usability and
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:25:04AM CEST, I got a letter
where David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
> > in fully git environment.
>
> Maybe
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
> in fully git environment.
Maybe -- if we are prepared to propagate the BK myth that network
bandwidth and disk space are free.
Meanwhile, in the real world, it'd be
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:47:05AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > I'd suggest making it [index] big-endian to make sure the LE weenies don't
> > forget to byteswap
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:47:05AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I'd suggest making it [index] big-endian to make sure the LE weenies don't
forget to byteswap properly.
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
in fully git environment.
Maybe -- if we are prepared to propagate the BK myth that network
bandwidth and disk space are free.
Meanwhile, in the real world, it'd be
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:25:04AM CEST, I got a letter
where David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
in fully git environment.
Maybe -- if we
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:35:21AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:38:52AM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 11:42 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
It's fine to share the objects database. If you want to share the
directory cache, you are doing something wrong, though. What do you
need it for?
I want to _not_ care which machine I happen to be on when I use git
repositories which live
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:46:19AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
I'll bet at the top of this you have a mktemp error.
Indeed, thanks.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
* Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, and the other thing is:
$ git pull
GNU Interactive Tools 4.3.20 (armv4l-rmk-linux-gnu), 20:02:38 Mar 7 2001
GIT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
Le mercredi 13 avril 2005 10:25 +0100, David Woodhouse a crit :
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
in fully git environment.
Maybe -- if we are prepared to propagate the BK myth that network
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, David Woodhouse wrote:
I'd even like to see support for using multiple branches checked out of
the same .git/ repository.
David, we already can. The objects are _designed_ to be shared.
However, that is the .git/objects subdirectory. Not the per-view stuff.
For each
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 07:38 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
David, we already can. The objects are _designed_ to be shared.
However, that is the .git/objects subdirectory. Not the per-view stuff.
For each _view_ you do need to have view-specific data, and the view index
very much is that.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
I've already noticed GNU interactive tools (googling for git), but
it's Linus' choice of name. Alternative suggestions welcomed. What
about 'gt'? ;-)
'gt' or 'gi' both sound fine - 'gi' being a bit faster to type ;-).
(Even 'get' seems to
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, David Woodhouse wrote:
In other words, that index file simply _cannot_ be shared. Don't even
think about it. Only madness will ensue.
If I use git in my home directory I cannot _help_ but share it.
Sometimes I'm using it from a BE box, sometimes from a LE box.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:25:04AM CEST, I got a letter
where David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:59 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Theoretically, you are never supposed to share your index if you work
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your
HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the new directory. The easiest
thing is to cp -r your
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your
HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the new
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your
HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the new
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
I tried this today, applied my patch for BE-LE conversions and
glibc-2.2 compatibility (attached, still
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:13:39PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:03:07PM CEST, I got a letter
where Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
I tried this today, applied my patch for BE-LE
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:13:15PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:02 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
> > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:02 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > here goes git-pasky-0.3,
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
> > Linus' git, aimed at human
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:02 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 15:57 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:13:15PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:02 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:47:25PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] told
44 matches
Mail list logo
