Em Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 06:07:08PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> (2014/11/05 15:50), Hemant Kumar wrote:
> >> And also, user interface is a discussion point. This series defines new
> >> sdt-cache command, and we already have buildid-cache command. We should
> >> have probe-cache command
(2014/11/05 15:50), Hemant Kumar wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> (2014/11/04 17:06), Hemant Kumar wrote:
>>> Hi Namhyung,
>>>
>>> On 11/04/2014 01:08 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Hemant,
As you know, you need to keep an eye on how (kprobes) event cache
patchset from Masami
(2014/11/05 15:50), Hemant Kumar wrote:
Hi Masami,
Hi,
(2014/11/04 17:06), Hemant Kumar wrote:
Hi Namhyung,
On 11/04/2014 01:08 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Hemant,
As you know, you need to keep an eye on how (kprobes) event cache
patchset from Masami settles down. For those who aren't
Em Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 06:07:08PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
(2014/11/05 15:50), Hemant Kumar wrote:
And also, user interface is a discussion point. This series defines new
sdt-cache command, and we already have buildid-cache command. We should
have probe-cache command too? or
Hi Masami,
Hi,
(2014/11/04 17:06), Hemant Kumar wrote:
Hi Namhyung,
On 11/04/2014 01:08 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Hemant,
As you know, you need to keep an eye on how (kprobes) event cache
patchset from Masami settles down. For those who aren't CC'ed, please
see the link below:
Hi Masami,
Hi,
(2014/11/04 17:06), Hemant Kumar wrote:
Hi Namhyung,
On 11/04/2014 01:08 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Hemant,
As you know, you need to keep an eye on how (kprobes) event cache
patchset from Masami settles down. For those who aren't CC'ed, please
see the link below:
6 matches
Mail list logo