Re: Re : [CHECKER] 28 potential interrupt errors

2001-03-22 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jean Tourrilhes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree that the IrDA stack is full of irq/locking bugs (there >is a patch of mine waiting in Dag's mailbox), but this one is not a >bug, it's a false positive. > The restore_flags(flags); will restore the

Re: Re : [CHECKER] 28 potential interrupt errors

2001-03-22 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 03:49:31PM -0800, Junfeng Yang wrote: > > Sometimes the line number reported by the checker is not correct. > But if you go into the function, you can find the bug. Gotcha. It in fact indicate the error at the end of the function instead of the place where the

Re: Re : [CHECKER] 28 potential interrupt errors

2001-03-22 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 03:49:31PM -0800, Junfeng Yang wrote: Sometimes the line number reported by the checker is not correct. But if you go into the function, you can find the bug. Gotcha. It in fact indicate the error at the end of the function instead of the place where the error

Re: Re : [CHECKER] 28 potential interrupt errors

2001-03-22 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jean Tourrilhes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree that the IrDA stack is full of irq/locking bugs (there is a patch of mine waiting in Dag's mailbox), but this one is not a bug, it's a false positive. The restore_flags(flags); will restore the state of