In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Nate Eldredge wrote:
>> (32 bytes is the size of a cache line.) A memory tester might be
>> something to try (I wrote a simple program that seemed to show the
>> error better than memtest86; can send it if desired.)
>
>Already tried
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> (32 bytes is the size of a cache line.) A memory tester might be
> something to try (I wrote a simple program that seemed to show the
> error better than memtest86; can send it if desired.)
Already tried that... this system has passed some 20 hours
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Well, the 2.2 distributed with Mandrake 7.2 works fine ... :)
> >
> > Hmmm... 32 CONSECUTIVE bytes are a very peculiar error. What can it be?
> >
> > Still experimenting...
>
> I once ran into a problem with 32-byte
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Nate Eldredge wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the 2.2 distributed with Mandrake 7.2 works fine ... :)
Hmmm... 32 CONSECUTIVE bytes are a very peculiar error. What can it be?
Still experimenting...
I once ran into a problem with 32-byte errors appearing
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Nate Eldredge wrote:
(32 bytes is the size of a cache line.) A memory tester might be
something to try (I wrote a simple program that seemed to show the
error better than memtest86; can send it if desired.)
Already tried that... this system has passed some 20 hours
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Nate Eldredge wrote:
(32 bytes is the size of a cache line.) A memory tester might be
something to try (I wrote a simple program that seemed to show the
error better than memtest86; can send it if desired.)
Already tried that...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, the 2.2 distributed with Mandrake 7.2 works fine ... :)
>
> Hmmm... 32 CONSECUTIVE bytes are a very peculiar error. What can it be?
>
> Still experimenting...
I once ran into a problem with 32-byte errors appearing in files, and
later, in memory. I eventually
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the 2.2 distributed with Mandrake 7.2 works fine ... :)
Hmmm... 32 CONSECUTIVE bytes are a very peculiar error. What can it be?
Still experimenting...
I once ran into a problem with 32-byte errors appearing in files, and
later, in memory. I eventually
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Gérard Roudier wrote:
> using a sym53c875 controller. In this case, kernel 2.2 was fine.
>
> > Now I'll build some old 2.2 kernel to try...
>
> If 2.2 is ok with your tape, a software error in 2.4 gets very likely, in
> my opinion.
Well, the 2.2 distributed with Mandrake
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Grard Roudier wrote:
using a sym53c875 controller. In this case, kernel 2.2 was fine.
Now I'll build some old 2.2 kernel to try...
If 2.2 is ok with your tape, a software error in 2.4 gets very likely, in
my opinion.
Well, the 2.2 distributed with Mandrake 7.2 works
10 matches
Mail list logo
