Re: TCP Vegas implementation for Linux

2001-04-01 Thread David S. Miller
Dan Hollis writes: > tcp vegas performs very badly for me on asymmetric links (e.g. adsl), > about 50% performance loss vs non-vegas. This among other reasons is why I ripped out vegas from the kernel a couple years ago. I'm actually disappointed vendors have added this patch because it is

Re: TCP Vegas implementation for Linux

2001-04-01 Thread David S. Miller
Chip Salzenberg writes: > Our (VA's) kernel includes a Vegas patch: > >ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/chip/linux-vegas-v2-patch-2.2 Slight typo in the URL, it's: ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/chip/kernel/linux-vegas-v2-patch-2.2 Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To

Re: TCP Vegas implementation for Linux

2001-04-01 Thread Dan Hollis
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > Our (VA's) kernel includes a Vegas patch: >ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/chip/linux-vegas-v2-patch-2.2 tcp vegas performs very badly for me on asymmetric links (e.g. adsl), about 50% performance loss vs non-vegas. -Dan - To unsubscribe from

Re: TCP Vegas implementation for Linux

2001-04-01 Thread Chip Salzenberg
Our (VA's) kernel includes a Vegas patch: ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/chip/linux-vegas-v2-patch-2.2 -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "We have no fuel on board, plus or minus 8 kilograms." -- NEAR tech - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: TCP Vegas implementation for Linux

2001-04-01 Thread Chip Salzenberg
Our (VA's) kernel includes a Vegas patch: ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/chip/linux-vegas-v2-patch-2.2 -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "We have no fuel on board, plus or minus 8 kilograms." -- NEAR tech - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: TCP Vegas implementation for Linux

2001-04-01 Thread Dan Hollis
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Chip Salzenberg wrote: Our (VA's) kernel includes a Vegas patch: ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/chip/linux-vegas-v2-patch-2.2 tcp vegas performs very badly for me on asymmetric links (e.g. adsl), about 50% performance loss vs non-vegas. -Dan - To unsubscribe from

Re: TCP Vegas implementation for Linux

2001-04-01 Thread David S. Miller
Chip Salzenberg writes: Our (VA's) kernel includes a Vegas patch: ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/chip/linux-vegas-v2-patch-2.2 Slight typo in the URL, it's: ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/chip/kernel/linux-vegas-v2-patch-2.2 Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To

Re: TCP Vegas implementation for Linux

2001-04-01 Thread David S. Miller
Dan Hollis writes: tcp vegas performs very badly for me on asymmetric links (e.g. adsl), about 50% performance loss vs non-vegas. This among other reasons is why I ripped out vegas from the kernel a couple years ago. I'm actually disappointed vendors have added this patch because it is