Re: unresolved symbols still in 2.4.30-rc2 (usbserial needs symbol tty_ldisc_ref and tty_ldisc_deref which are EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL)

2005-03-26 Thread David Dyck
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 at 20:13 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 10:52:30AM -0800, David Dyck wrote: I've been noticing that I'm still getting some "unresolved symbols" with the 2.4.30 pre and rc series. ... ver_linux reports: ... modutils 2.4.2 ... A modutils upgrade sh

Re: unresolved symbols still in 2.4.30-rc2 (usbserial needs symbol tty_ldisc_ref and tty_ldisc_deref which are EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL)

2005-03-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 10:52:30AM -0800, David Dyck wrote: > > I've been noticing that I'm still getting some "unresolved symbols" > with the 2.4.30 pre and rc series. >... > ver_linux reports: >... > modutils 2.4.2 >... A modutils upgrade should fix your problems. cu Adrian --

Re: Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.28-pre2/xfree-drm/via_drv.o

2005-03-18 Thread Martin MOKREJŠ
Marcelo Tosatti wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:21:12PM +0100, Martin MOKREJ? wrote: Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 16:03 +0100, Martin MOKREJ?? wrote: Hi, does anyone still use 2.4 series kernel? ;) # make dep; make bzImage; make modules [cut] # make modules_install [cut] cd /li

Re: Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.28-pre2/xfree-drm/via_drv.o

2005-03-16 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:21:12PM +0100, Martin MOKREJ? wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 16:03 +0100, Martin MOKREJ?? wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >> does anyone still use 2.4 series kernel? ;) > > >># make dep; make bzImage; make modules > >>[cut] > >># make modules_install > >>[

Re: Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.28-pre2/xfree-drm/via_drv.o

2005-03-16 Thread Martin MOKREJÅ
Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 16:03 +0100, Martin MOKREJÅ wrote: Hi, does anyone still use 2.4 series kernel? ;) # make dep; make bzImage; make modules [cut] # make modules_install [cut] cd /lib/modules/2.4.30-pre3-bk2; \ mkdir -p pcmcia; \ find kernel -path '*/pcmcia/*' -name '*.o

Re: Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.28-pre2/xfree-drm/via_drv.o

2005-03-16 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 16:03 +0100, Martin MOKREJÅ wrote: > Hi, > does anyone still use 2.4 series kernel? ;) > # make dep; make bzImage; make modules > [cut] > # make modules_install > [cut] > cd /lib/modules/2.4.30-pre3-bk2; \ > mkdir -p pcmcia; \ > find kernel -path '*/pcmcia/*' -name '*.o' | x

Re: Unresolved symbols since 2.4.5 ?

2001-07-05 Thread Erik Mouw
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Cyril ADRIAN wrote: > > "Erik" == Erik Mouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Erik> Looks like your system has an old version of modutils. You need Adrian > Erik> Bunk's linux-2.4 packages for running linux-2.4.* with Debian potato. > Erik>

Re: Unresolved symbols since 2.4.5 ?

2001-07-05 Thread Cyril ADRIAN
Hello, Thank you for your fast answer :o) > "Erik" == Erik Mouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Erik> Looks like your system has an old version of modutils. You need Adrian Erik> Bunk's linux-2.4 packages for running linux-2.4.* with Debian potato. Erik> Add the followin

Re: Unresolved symbols since 2.4.5 ?

2001-07-05 Thread Erik Mouw
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:32:21PM +0200, Cyril ADRIAN wrote: > In short, since 2.4.5 I seem not to be able to install a kernel (depmod > says "unresolved symbols"). 2.4.6 shows the same problem but as far as I > remember 2.4.4 did not. The sources I use are downloaded straigh

Re: unresolved symbols printk ?

2001-05-30 Thread Nico Schottelius
Hmm guys, my machine doesn't even work after I made mrproper and all the things! It is still the same old message with unresolved symbols! What to do now ? Nico - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo

Re: unresolved symbols printk ?

2001-05-29 Thread Keith Owens
On Tue, 29 May 2001 15:54:36 +0200, Nico Schottelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Just a small question, what could be the reason I have a broken >Makefile ? >This seems to happen frequently, if there is a need >to name it into the lkml. I am surprised >a makefile gets screwed up ? It is the make

Re: unresolved symbols printk ?

2001-05-29 Thread Nico Schottelius
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 07:00:39PM +0200, Nico Schottelius wrote: > > I am having problems with loading modules: > > I always get the unresolved symbols message. > > I didn't find any documentation for that, can you help me ? > > You did read question 8.8 from the linux-kernel mailing list FAQ?

Re: unresolved symbols printk ?

2001-05-28 Thread Erik Mouw
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 07:00:39PM +0200, Nico Schottelius wrote: > I am having problems with loading modules: > I always get the unresolved symbols message. > I didn't find any documentation for that, can you help me ? You did read question 8.8 from the linux-kernel mailing list FAQ? http://w

Re: unresolved symbols on SPARC with depmod -ae

2001-04-05 Thread Jeff Layton
Yep the module loaded fine. Must be a problem with depmod then. Thanks for the info! caladan:~# modprobe ip_conntrack caladan:~# lsmod Module Size Used by ip_conntrack 19840 0 (unused) -- Jeff Layton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "In order for you to profit from your mi

Re: unresolved symbols on SPARC with depmod -ae

2001-04-05 Thread David S. Miller
Jeff Layton writes: > Anyway here's what I get, should I be concerned about this? ... > caladan:~# /sbin/depmod -ae -F /boot/System.map-2.4.2 > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in > /lib/modules/2.4.2/kernel/drivers/block/loop.o > depmod: .div > depmod: .urem > depmod:

Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

2001-02-10 Thread Dag Wieers
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: >> Rejected. It is meant not to be there. > > To be more specific ... __bad_udelay() is meant to be an > unresolvable symbol, which is referenced when people call > udelay with a "wrong" timeout. Maybe this (and similar situations) could be added to the l

Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

2001-02-10 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as > > described below. > > Rejected. It is meant not to be there. To be more specific ... __bad_udelay() is meant to be an unresolvable symbol, which is referenced when people call udel

Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

2001-02-10 Thread Alan Cox
> I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as > described below. Rejected. It is meant not to be there. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml

Re: Unresolved symbols

2001-01-30 Thread Rusty Russell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > Hi again Rusty God I'm an idiot. I swear I've fixed this before. <>. Yep, I did. And before that, the same bug in the conntrack code. This fixed the `core nat compiled in, rest as modules' case, of course, by actually exporting the symbols. Rusty.

Re: Unresolved symbols

2001-01-14 Thread Rusty Russell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > Hi Rusty, > > Some more unresolved symbols for you from the latest prerelease linux kernel: Does this fix it? If so I'll send to Linus... Cheers, Rusty. -- http://linux.conf.au The Linux conference Australia needed. diff -urN -I \$.*\$ -X /tmp/kernd

Re: unresolved symbols pm_*register ad1848.o

2000-12-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Samuelson] > Looks like your symbol versions got out of sync, somehow. Uh, never mind, I didn't notice that pm.c is not listed as exporting symbols. Someone else just posted a patch -- add pm.o to the 'export-objs' line in kernel/Makefile. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: unresolved symbols pm_*register ad1848.o

2000-12-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[khromy] > 2.4.0-test13-pre3 unresolved symbols: > > modprobe ad1848 > /lib/modules/2.4.0-test13-pre3/kernel/drivers/sound/ad1848.o: unresolved symbol >pm_unregister_Reccd1e64 > /lib/modules/2.4.0-test13-pre3/kernel/drivers/sound/ad1848.o: unresolved symbol >pm_register_R8dbab11c Looks like y

Re: unresolved symbols in ipx module

2000-10-13 Thread Michael Vines
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, John Williams wrote: > This means to add ipx to the kernel, I have to rebuild the entire kernel > and boot with it in order to satisfy the dependancies. I cannot just > compile it as a module and add it because it has non-modular dependancies. I encountered this same proble