On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, David Ford wrote:
> I have Marcelo's patch. It isn't applicable because I am purposely not enabling any
> swap. The problem is the system gets down to about 7 megs of buffers free and within
> three seconds has become functionally dead. Zero response on any user
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, David Ford wrote:
> Since the testN series and up through ac12, I experience total loss of
> control when memory is nearly exhausted.
>
> I start with 256M and eat it up with programs until there is only about
> 7 megs left, no swap. From that point all user processes
I have Marcelo's patch. It isn't applicable because I am purposely not enabling any
swap. The problem is the system gets down to about 7 megs of buffers free and within
three seconds has become functionally dead. Zero response on any user input/output
device save the magic key.
The system
I have Marcelo's patch. It isn't applicable because I am purposely not enabling any
swap. The problem is the system gets down to about 7 megs of buffers free and within
three seconds has become functionally dead. Zero response on any user input/output
device save the magic key.
The system
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, David Ford wrote:
Since the testN series and up through ac12, I experience total loss of
control when memory is nearly exhausted.
I start with 256M and eat it up with programs until there is only about
7 megs left, no swap. From that point all user processes stall
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, David Ford wrote:
I have Marcelo's patch. It isn't applicable because I am purposely not enabling any
swap. The problem is the system gets down to about 7 megs of buffers free and within
three seconds has become functionally dead. Zero response on any user
6 matches
Mail list logo
